Is Russia Preparing to Go to
War in Ukraine?
Troop buildup near Ukraine’s border is the largest
since 2014.
| APRIL 9, 2021, 5:03 PM
Russian President Vladimir Putin inspects Zapad 2017 joint Russian military
exercises with Belarus at the Luzhsky training ground in the Leningrad region,
on Sept. 18, 2017. MIKHAIL
KLIMENTYEV/SPUTNIK/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES
Russia’s
military buildup near the border of Ukraine continued this week, deepening
global concern about Moscow’s ultimate intentions as senior Russian officials
and state media dial up their incendiary rhetoric.
What seemed
like a show of force to the new Biden administration has become, perhaps,
something bigger. Videos posted on social media appear to show convoys of military
vehicles arriving in the region from as far away as Siberia, according to an
analysis by the open-source investigative group the Conflict Intelligence Team. Troops are massing
just south of the Russian city of Voronezh, some 155 miles away from the border
with Ukraine—far enough away that an immediate invasion seems unlikely, but
close enough to set nerves on edge.
The movement
of troops from western and southern military districts far exceeds what would
normally be expected for a standard exercise of the sort Russia has been
carrying out of late. What is both puzzling and troubling about the buildup in
Voronezh is its apparent offensive posture, said Kirill Mikhailov, a researcher
with the Conflict Intelligence Team. The region borders government-controlled
Ukraine, not the breakaway regions in Donetsk and Luhansk, where local proxies
are dependent on Russian support.
The military
buildup has been accompanied by increased saber-rattling by Russian officials.
On Thursday, senior Kremlin official Dmitry Kozak warned a major escalation in
the conflict would mark the “beginning of the end of Ukraine.” At the same
time, Russia, which has sought to paint Ukraine as an aggressor with warnings
that Kyiv is preparing to ethnically
cleanse the Donbass of Russians, has flagged intervention. On
Friday, Russian press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, warned Russia could be forced
to intervene in the event that a “human catastrophe similar to Srebrenica”
arises, referring to the genocidal slaughter of more than 8,000 Bosnian Muslims
by Serbian forces in July 1995.
On Thursday,
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said the United States is increasingly
alarmed by “escalating Russian aggressions” in the region. On Friday, Secretary
of State Antony Blinken spoke with his German counterpart, Heiko Maas, in which
they emphasized the importance of standing by Ukraine against “unilateral Russian
provocations.”
The conflict
and bellicose rhetoric have flared periodically since a 2015 peace deal brought
the worst of the fighting to an end and ushered in an uneasy stalemate. But
Western leaders are clearly rattled. On Thursday, CNN reported the United
States is considering sending warships to the Black Sea in a
display of support.
Long-time
observers of the conflict say an all-out invasion is unlikely. “I think
everyone is in a similar place where we’re watching closely. I still think it’s
more signaling and demonstration, but obviously no one is willing to exclude
the fact that it could turn into something more serious,” said Andrea
Kendall-Taylor, director of the transatlantic security program at the Center
for a New American Security, who previously served as deputy national
intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence
Council.
The reason
for the buildup remains unclear, but experts point to domestic factors in
Russia, Ukraine, and the United States.
Russian
President Vladimir Putin’s approval ratings have continued to slump to an
all-time low. The Kremlin is still grappling with the pandemic and, in January,
saw mass street protests across the country in the wake of opposition leader
Alexei Navalny’s arrest, who went on a hunger strike last week to demand medical
treatment as his health has deteriorated.
“There is a
whole slew of increasingly confrontational steps coming out of the Kremlin,”
said Kendall-Taylor, including the recent humiliation of the European Union’s
top diplomat Josep Borrell on his trip to Moscow and the decision to
indefinitely recall the Russian ambassador to the United States for
consultations. “It feels like Putin is drumming up the besieged Russia
narrative.”
READ MORE
Russia’s Buildup
Near Ukraine Puts Team Biden on Edge
Is Russia testing the
waters or just testing Biden?
REPORT |
AMY MACKINNON, JACK DETSCH, ROBBIE GRAMER
Ukraine Cracks
Down on Its Own Pro-Russian QAnon
With media bans and
treason charges, well-financed conspiracy peddlers are being shut down.
ARGUMENT |
Ukrainian
President Volodymyr Zelensky has taken an increasingly hard line against
Russia, sanctioning Putin ally Viktor Medvedchuk and shuttering three TV
stations controlled by the oligarch as his own approval ratings have fallen and
he has struggled to end the war.
Moscow may
believe it can provoke Zelensky into making a knee-jerk move in the Donbass,
which would justify a Russian response—much as it did in Georgia in 2008 when
former Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili stumbled into war over the
breakaway territory of South Ossetia.
“[It] seems
that leading elites in Moscow perceive Zelensky as a Saakashvili type,” said
Michael Kofman, a senior research scientist at CNA. “This perception,
inaccurate though it may be, has real world consequences,” he said.
And then
there’s the new administration in Washington. U.S. President Joe Biden is
familiar with Ukraine, having served as former President Barack Obama’s point
person on the conflict. “I think there could be some concern in the Kremlin
that with the incoming Biden administration, that Zelensky may feel like he has
more leeway to do things that Moscow doesn’t like,” Kendall-Taylor said.
Putin, in
the end, may want to replay 2008 but does not have the cards on the table.
“What Putin
would love to do is not invade but repeat 2008 in Georgia,” said Taras Kuzio, a
professor at the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, speaking at an
event hosted by the German Marshall Fund on Friday. But “Zelensky is not
Saakashvilli,” he said.
Amy Mackinnon is a national
security and intelligence reporter at Foreign Policy. Twitter: @ak_mack
No comments:
Post a Comment