EURONEWS News World USA Trump follows through on threats as he announces significant troop withdrawal from Germany - By Malek Fouda Published on 02/05/2026 - 8:30 GMT+2

 EURONEWS

NewsWorldUSA

Trump follows through on threats as he announces significant troop withdrawal from Germany

Copyright AP Photo/Matt Rourke

By Malek Fouda

Published on 02/05/2026 - 8:30 GMT+2

ShareComments

Listen to this article now...

Trump follows through on threats as he announces significant troop withdrawal from Germany

Trump had earlier threatened to pull some US troops from Germany after Chancellor Friedrich Merz expressed his disapproval with the US-Israeli war on Iran, which has upended the Middle East and caused a global oil price crisis.

US President Donald Trump announced that his country will withdraw 5,000 active-duty troops from NATO ally Germany in the next six to 12 months, fulfilling his earlier threats after Trump clashes with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz over the US-Israeli war in Iran.

Trump had threatened to withdraw some troops from the NATO ally earlier this week after Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Washington was being “humiliated” by the Iranian leadership and criticised their lack of strategy in the war.

Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement that the “decision follows a thorough review of the Department’s force posture in Europe and is in recognition of theatre requirements and conditions on the ground.”

Germany hosts several US military facilities, including the headquarters of its European and Africa commands, Ramstein Air Base and a medical centre in Landstuhl, where casualties from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were treated. US nuclear missiles are also stationed in the country.

President Donald Trump speaks at the Raymond F. Kravis Center for the Performing Arts in West Palm Beach Fla., Friday, May 1, 2026 Matt Rourke/Copyright 2026 The AP. All rights reserved.

The number of troops leaving Germany would be around 14% of the total deployment in the country, which exceeds 36,000 US service members.

News of the troop withdrawal drew swift pushback from Democrats in Congress, who say that the move will benefit Russian President Vladimir Putin and weaken US security interests.

The withdrawal “suggests American commitments to our allies are dependent on the president’s mood," said Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

"The president should immediately cease this reckless action before he causes irreversible consequences for our alliances and long-term national security,” Reed added.

Trump made a similar threat in his first term, saying he would pull close to 10,000 of the roughly 34,500 US troops who were then stationed in Germany at the time, but he didn’t start the process.

US Vice President JD Vance visits with service members during a refueling stop at Ramstein Air Base, Germany, Thursday April 24, 2025 Kenny Holston/KENNY HOLSTON/The New York Times

Democratic President Joe Biden formally stopped the planned withdrawal soon after taking office in 2021.

The US president has mused for years about reducing US military presence in Germany, and has railed against NATO for its refusal to assist Washington in the war, which began on 28 February with US-Israeli strikes on Tehran.

US allies in NATO have braced for a potential troop withdrawal since Trump took office last year, after Washington warned that Europe would have to look after its own security, including that of Ukraine, in the future.

Depending on operations, exercises and troop rotations, the US stations around 80,000-100,000 personnel in the continent. Analysts say the move could carry disastrous consequences at a time of heightened global instability, conflicts and wars.

Additional sources 

Middle East Forum Dispatch - May 1,2026 - by Winfield Myers - The War Has Severely Damaged Iran’s Economy

 

View on web  |  Read what you missed The War Has Severely Damaged Iran’s Economy By Winfield Myers ● May 01, 2026 Smart Brevity® count: 6.5 mins...1704 words Dalga Khatinoglu writes that the the economic toll of more than two months of war is visible in Iran, as a U.S. naval blockade and the effective halt of the country’s maritime trade triggers mounting pressure across the economy. The sharp depreciation of the Iranian rial—now at 1.8 million to the dollar—is the clearest sign so far of a broader economic breakdown now unfolding. Adding to the nation’s troubles are years of systemic corruption, economic mismanagement, sanctions, and regional adventurism that had already pushed Iran’s economy close to the edge. Khatinoglu argues that the war may prove to be not merely another shock, but potentially the final blow to the Islamic Republic’s revenue model. We also feature the work of Hussein Aboubakr Mansour, Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi, Rugash Jabari, Jose Lev Alvarez Gomez, and Giulio Meotti, among other authors. The War’s Severe Damage to Iran’s Economy Comes Into View By: Dalga Khatinoglu The economic toll of more than two months of war is palpable in Iran, as a U.S. naval blockade chokes maritime trade and pressures the economy. Why it matters: The Iranian rial’s sharp depreciation highlights the unfolding economic breakdown. On April 29, 2026, the U.S. dollar surged 12 percent against the rial, reaching nearly 1.8 million rials—marking one of the steepest daily declines ever. Trade disruptions: Iranian data show severe trade and energy disruptions. Non-oil exports in March 2026 plunged to $6.4 billion, almost half of March 2025 levels, while crude unloading at Chinese ports dropped 15 percent. Regional isolation: The United Arab Emirates, Iran’s second-largest trading partner, halts trade after Iranian attacks. The UAE has expelled hundreds of Iranian business operators, disrupting financial networks crucial for sanctions evasion. To read the full article, click here. Secure Your Spot: The 2026 Middle East Forum Policy Conference Join us in Washington, D.C., from May 19-21, 2026, for the Middle East Forum's exclusive Policy Conference as we navigate the turbulent aftermath of the Iran war and its regional shockwaves. This private gat hering will tackle today's most pressing geopolitical challenges, featuring in-depth analyses of Turkey's shifting influence and the vital future of the U.S.-Israel relationship. We will also confront the rising threat of domestic Islamists, equipping attendees with the strategic insights needed to counter these interconnected issues. Click here to secure your spot for America the Unpredictable and access our special hotel block before the May 1st RSVP deadline. The United Arab Emirates’ OPEC Exit: Strategic Implications for the Gulf Order By: Hussein Aboubakr Mansour The United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) withdrawal from OPEC and OPEC+ marks a pivotal moment, driven by five distinct pressures including strategic rivalry with Saudi Arabia and alignment with the U.S. Quota grievance: The UAE’s long-standing frustration with OPEC production quotas has culminated in this defection. Abu Dhabi had been producing below its capacity, aiming to convert reserves into sovereign wealth before peak oil demand. Wartime disappointment: The Gulf Cooperation Council’s (GCC) weak response to Iranian attacks accelerated the UAE’s decision. Diplomatic adviser Anwar Gargash criticized the GCC for historical inadequacy, likening it to the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Strategic choreography: The UAE staged its OPEC exit alongside a series of moves asserting strategic independence. Withdrawing from OPEC was part of a broader shift, as the UAE aligns more closely with the U.S. and Israel, reshaping the Gulf’s strategic landscape. To read the full article, click here. The Campaign for Jewish Settlements in Southern Syria: Interview with the ‘Pioneers of Bashan Movement’  emerged showing Israeli activists crossing the  Israeli-controlled Golan Heights border  and occupying property near Majdal Shams,  sparking tensions. These activists were part of the “ Pioneers of Bashan Movement,” which seeks to  establish Jewish settlements in southern Syria, a  region it calls “Bashan” (mentioned in the Bible  and encompassing parts of southern Syria). The author conducted an interview today with Amos Azaria, a board member of the movement, a lecturer at Ariel University. Why it matters: Participants seek to establish Jewish settlements in southern Syria, citing both historical ties and security interests. Amos Azaria, a board member, highlights the significance of Bashan for Israel’s security and historical connection. Activists‘ stance: The movement supports settlement to prevent hostile forces from approaching Israel’s borders. They argue that Jewish settlement creates long-term security through civilian presence and infrastructure development. Government response: The Israeli government has not officially endorsed the movement, although many in the IDF and some ministers show support. The IDF removed activists from the Golan, reflecting governmental hesitancy despite grassroots backing. To read the full interview, click here. Washington Must Not Tolerate Countries Imprisoning People for the ‘Crime’ of Talking with U.S. Officials By: Rugash Jabari Five and a half years ago, journalist Sherwan Sherwani was arrested by the Kurdistan Regional Government for meeting with the U.S. Consul General in Erbil. Why it matters: Sherwani’s case symbolizes the suppression of press freedom under a U.S.-backed regional government. His ongoing imprisonment undermines the Kurdistan Region’s reputation and weakens trust in its institutions. The arrest: In October 2020, security forces stormed Sherwani’s home, arresting him in front of his children. He was sentenced to six years in 2021 for allegedly endangering regional security, with charges later expanded based on weak evidence. Call to action: The U.S. has influence in Erbil and should advocate for Sherwan’s release. His case represents broader issues of press freedom and judicial independence in Kurdistan. To read the full article, click here. The Choice About Iraq’s Future Rests with Judge Faiq Zaidan By: Ali Mahmoud On April 19, 2026, U.S. Envoy Tom Barrack visited Iraq’s top judge, Faiq Zaidan, pressing for a decisive choice in Iraq’s leadership direction. Why it matters: Zaidan’s decision will shape Iraq’s political future, determining whether it maintains its current fragile balance or seeks genuine reform. The U.S. and Iran vie for influence, with each supporting different outcomes for Iraq’s next prime minister. Judiciary’s role: As head of the Supreme Judicial Council, Zaidan has been pivotal in Iraq’s leadership decisions since 2018. His influence has maintained a system prioritizing crisis management over stability. Call to action: The U.S. sanctions signal urgency for change, with pressure building on Zaidan to act decisively. A choice must be made to either facilitate reform or risk Iraq’s further slide into instability. To read the full article, click here. Argentina’s Libertarian Realignment Strengthens Israel and Counters Iran in Latin America By: Jose Lev Alvarez Gomez In an era of rising threats, Argentinian President Javier Milei emerges as a staunch defender of Israel, the U.S., and Western civilization. Why it matters: Argentina’s alignment with Israel, through the newly launched Isaac Accords, signifies a major realignment in Latin America. Milei’s economic reforms and pro-Israel stance highlight a commitment to Judeo-Christian values and Western alliances. Strategic impact: The Isaac Accords counter Iran’s influence in the Western Hemisphere, targeting Hezbollah-linked networks. The agreement strengthens partnerships against terrorism and promotes shared prosperity through security and AI collaboration. Diplomatic potential: The Argentina-Israel partnership paves the way for innovative solutions in regional diplomacy. Policymakers are encouraged to explore joint development models, transforming traditional tensions into opportunities for collaboration. To read the full article, click here. Anti-Israel Barbarians Will Destroy Europe from Within By: Giulio Meotti Iran executes Bita Hemmati for protesting, while Berlin hosts a grotesque anti-Western, anti-Israel demonstration. Why it matters: Radical Islamist extremism is gaining ground in Europe, exploiting multiculturalism and tolerance. In Alexanderplatz, a performance mimicking Hamas-style executions highlights the challenge of unchecked ideologies. Cultural clash: Europe’s reluctance to confront radical Islamism fosters environments where Western values are despised and challenged. While Germany commemorates the Holocaust, it paradoxically permits demonstrations that echo its darkest chapters. Call to action: Europe must confront radical Islamist ideologies and reaffirm its commitment to integration and Western values. Tolerance must not equate to surrender; Europe needs to defend its cultural identity and demand respect from all who reside within its borders. To read the full article, click here. Madrid Is Mainstreaming Anti-Israel Extremism By: Jose Lev Alvarez Gomez