Hindistan Dışişleri Bakanlığından, ABD, Avustralya, Hindistan ve Japonya arasında diplomatik ortaklık kuran Quad'a ilişkin açıklama yapıldı.
Açıklamada, Quad Dışişleri Bakanları toplantısı kapsamında, ABD Dışişleri Bakanı Marco Rubio, Avustralya Dışişleri Bakanı Penny Wong ve Japonya Dışişleri Bakanı Motegi Toşimitsu'nun 26 Mayıs'ta Yeni Delhi'ye ziyarette bulunacağı belirtildi.
Resmi açıklamada toplantının "işbirliğinin geliştirilmesi" ve "bölgedeki son gelişmelerin ele alınması" amacını taşıdığı belirtilirken, gözlemciler bu buluşmanın asıl hedefinin Çin olduğu konusunda hemfikir.
Welcome to the Saturday Wrapup, where I get you the week’s news as I consume my morning caffeine with you.
To our paying subscribers: thank you. Your support has allowed us to remain at #2 in Rising News on Substack for our first two months. It’s also allowed us to hold our first Substack Lives with independent journalists Erin Reed and Hamilton Nolan. You make this possible. That means everything.
If you’re not yet a paying member, I’m asking you to join us today. Independent media has never mattered more. Support our people-powered movement and upgrade your subscription today.
Trump does something impeachable every day, but this week was different. Citizens in revolutionary France guillotined their nobility for less. Let’s talk about it.
The Most Impeachable Thing a President Has Ever Done
Every previous entry on the list of great American presidential scandals involved someone trying to hide what they were doing. Trump did this in a DOJ press release.
In January, Trump sued the IRS (which he controls) for $10 billion over the leak of his tax returns during his first term. The Justice Department (which he controls) was theoretically supposed to defend the government against this lawsuit. Instead, the DOJ lawyers tasked with defending the IRS never made an appearance or filing. Trump withdrew the suit before the judge could rule on its merits.
He sued himself, settled with himself, and won. What did he win? Two things: a permanent tax shield, and nearly two billion dollars in F-you money.
The settlement declares the U.S. is “forever barred and precluded” from examining or prosecuting Trump, his sons, and the Trump Organization for tax matters. Then there’s the creation of a $1,776,000,000 “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” a number chosen to invoke the year of the American Revolution.
But here’s what the headlines keep burying: the $1.776 billion figure is not based on anything real. The settlement itself states that the fund’s value does not represent the value of Trump’s claims, but is instead based on the “projected valuation of future claimants’ claims.” In other words, they made up a number.
There is no cap.
The five-member commission deciding who gets paid is handpicked entirely by Attorney General Todd Blanche, who was previously Trump’s personal criminal defense lawyer, which itself should be a scandal. Almost anyone alleging “weaponization” can apply, and Blanche has refused to say that people convicted of assaulting Capitol Police officers on January 6 would be excluded.
The money comes from the Treasury Department’s Judgment Fund, a permanent appropriation designed for paying government settlements. Congress has not approved a penny of it. The Constitution says explicitly that no money shall be drawn from the Treasury except through congressional appropriation.
In a functioning democracy, this alone would be a felony.
Now compare this to what came before. Teapot Dome, the great scandal of the 1920s, involved a Cabinet secretary secretly leasing federal oil reserves to private companies in exchange for bribes. It was corrupt, but it was one official acting outside his authority, who was eventually prosecuted and imprisoned.
Nixon used the IRS to harass political enemies. Reagan’s administration sold weapons to Iran and funneled the money to Nicaraguan rebels in defiance of Congress. These were serious abuses of power. But none of them involved the president engineering his own permanent legal immunity while creating a billion-dollar reward fund for his political allies.
Trump has already been impeached twice. Once for pressuring Ukraine, and once for January 6. Neither resulted in conviction. His actions this week make both of those look like parking tickets.
The founders were worried about a lot of things: a standing army, a state religion, taxation without representation. They did not anticipate a president who would sue his own Treasury Department, win, and use the proceeds to bankroll his friends. Not because they lacked imagination, but because they assumed the people watching would do something about it.
Luckily for us, the next president won’t have to — because Trump’s slush fund expires right before he leaves office.
President Donald Trump speaks to the media aboard Air Force One on May 15, 2026 as he returns to the United States from China. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
THIS IS THE TRUMP ERA, which means if you blink, you will miss another shattering example of unabashed corruption. I don’t usually write about the same topic twice in a row, but the latest revelations of Trump’s wanton, shameless profiteering from the White House cannot go unremarked. The phrase “drain the swamp” will go down in history as a bitter irony. The latest outrage against the public—and since I started typing this sentence there have surely been more—concerns Trump’s stock trades.
When I was being considered for a job in the Reagan White House, I had to reveal every cent I had ever earned from any job or investment (which was simple since I had no money), and everyone else who worked for the administration had to do the same. It was a pain, but I was happy to do it, knowing that I would be serving in an honest government. High-ranking officials like cabinet secretaries with substantial portfolios put their assets in blind trusts during their public service. “Blind” meaning the principal had no control. And though the ethics rules do not apply to the president, past presidents put their funds (with the exception of U.S. treasuries and mutual funds) into blind trusts anyway for appearances’ sake. The reason is obvious, but since this is a time of foggy ethics, let’s spell it out: Government officials are in a position to steer policy and award government contracts in ways that benefit or harm private interests. By requiring blind trusts, we minimize the chance that a decision-maker is swayed by the opportunity for private gain.1
Trump, naturally, defied this ethical norm outright. We learned from NOTUS last week that he went on a share-buying spree in the first months of this year, purchasing stock in companies that were about to get lucrative contracts. On January 6, Trump purchased between $500,000 and $1,000,000 (financial disclosure forms require a range, not exact figures) in Nvidia stock. A week later, the Commerce Department announced permission for Nvidia to sell chips to China. He also purchased stock in AMD, another AI chip maker, right before they too were granted the right to sell in China. Also in January, Trump purchased shares of Palantir for between $65,000 and $150,000, days before that company secured a billion-dollar contract to provide services to the Department of Homeland Security. Trump bought shares in Axon, a taser-manufacturing firm. Coincidentally, Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced a plan to spend $200 million over five years on new tasers.
A White House spokesman helpfully explained that “President Trump only acts in the best interests of the American public . . . President Trump’s assets are in a trust managed by his children. There are no conflicts of interest.” That is the definition of a conflict of interest. What do they take us for?
Remember the special forces guy who was caught betting on Polymarket before Nicolás Maduro’s capture? This dishonest master sergeant participated in the operation and apparently used his inside knowledge to bet $30,000 on the timing of Maduro’s fall, netting more than $400,000, because, lucky guess, he was right.
We can’t offer you a 13x return on a bet. But we can offer you original reporting, sharp analysis, and honest commentary. Join Bulwark+ for the best journalism around.
There were other suspicious bets placed on Polymarket just before major developments in the Iran war. Almost inexplicably well-timed bets were placed just before Israel’s attack on Iran, before the United States started bombing, before a ceasefire was announced, and at other key moments. Many accounts, some opened only hours before, made tidy sums. Who else in the Trump government may have made these bets? Did the president, ever grasping for lucre, take advantage of this ultimate form of insider trading?
IT’S WORTH NOTING that there was no “swamp,” at least not in the way Trump claimed. There are huge inefficiencies in the federal government, along with redundancies, waste, and overspending. But the main issue was never that the “swamp” denizens were siphoning off government funds for their private yachts. The chief corruption in Washington before Trump came along consisted of elected representatives unwilling to make tradeoffs between tax cuts and spending, thus creating ballooning deficits.
Old-school corruption was comparatively small-scale. In 2015, the United States scored 76 (where 100 is clean and 0 is totally corrupt) on Transparency International’s ratings, the sixteenth-least-corrupt nation in the world. Today, we are ranked sixty-fourth and dropping.
Before Trump came to dominate our politics, there was corruption—no nation is without it—but his constant howls about America being a “Third World nation” were not remotely true. Yet under his maladministration, we are making rapid progress in that direction. He crows that the United States is “respected” in the world now. Does he really believe that people respect kleptocracies? We are becoming more loathed than respected.
The American Bar Association offered a partial list of the pay-to-play transactions in the first few months of Trump’s second term. Coinbase contributed $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund, while its major investors, Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, together contributed another $6 million to the MAGA Inc. super PAC. In the early days of Trump’s second term, the SEC dropped an enforcement action against Coinbase. Other crypto players—Ripple, Robinhood, and Gemini—apparently seeing how the game is played, also made large contributions to Trump’s super PAC and were also rewarded by the SEC dropping charges. Ditto for Justin Sun, who purchased $75 million worth of World Liberty Financial tokens (putting money directly in the Trump family’s pockets). Not only were criminal charges against Sun dropped, but he was invited to a private White House dinner for top purchasers of WLF tokens.
When it’s too late to drop charges, pardons are for sale. A woman who donated $3.5 million to the MAGA super PAC was able to get a pardon for her father, who faced charges of bribing Puerto Rico’s governor. A healthcare executive who attended a $1 million-a-plate fundraising dinner with Trump secured a pardon for her son, Paul Walczak, a nursing-home owner who pleaded guilty to tax crimes. The pardon freed him from prison and also from the obligation to pay $4.4 million in restitution to his victims. There are many others: Changpeng Zhao, Trevor Milton, Joseph Schwartz, Lawrence Duran, and David Gentile—thieves, fraudsters, and swindlers all. A whole cottage industry has sprung up consisting of grifters taking fees for getting pardon petitions to Trump’s desk. You may not have thought of Rod Blagojevich lately, but having received a pardon from Trump himself, he’s now in the business of lobbying Trump on behalf of others. So are Keith Schiller, George Sorial, Jack Burkman, Jacob Wohl, and Ches McDowell.
WHICH BRINGS US TO THE PUTRID “deal” that is apparently in the works to “settle” Trump’s lawsuits against the U.S. government. Recall that Trump brought suit against the Department of Justice for the Mar-a-Lago search and the Russia investigation, and against the IRS for the unauthorized release of his tax returns (which wasn’t the IRS’s doing). His original ludicrous ask in the IRS suit was $10 billion (two thirds of the IRS’s annual budget) along with $230 million for the other inconveniences. As the judge in the IRS case observed, Trump was sitting on both sides of the table, and thus there is no actual case, just an undisguised attempt to loot taxpayers. She asked for briefs on this question due by May 20. Rushing to beat the deadline in which sanity might prevail, the administration announced that a deal is in the works to avoid the court altogether and hand Trump $1.7 billion in taxpayer dollars for a gargantuan slush fund. Under the terms of this deal with himself, Trump would agree to drop the $10 billion and $230 million suits in exchange for $1.7 billion to compensate anyone who claims to have been injured by what Trump considers the Biden administration’s weaponization of the Justice Department.
It’s just as grotesque as you imagine. Trump is reaching his grubby hands into the largest till in the world, the U.S. Treasury. Along with an apology from the IRS, the arrangement would also guarantee that the IRS would never audit any member of the Trump family ever again. As The Bulwark’s Andrew Egger described it:
The members of the commission overseeing disbursements [of the $1.7 billion] would serve at Trump’s pleasure, and he’d be able to remove them without cause at any time. The commission would have no obligation to disclose its decision-making process for how to disburse the money.
And then, of course, there’s the unbearable rottenness of the purported settlement fund itself: the shamelessness of Trump keeping a backdoor way to profit from it personally, the utter absence of any oversight controls that would even allow him to plausibly argue that the money will be spent justly, and the completely topsy-turvy travesty of creating a slush fund for January 6ers and other MAGA villains in the first place.
The Trump administration already gifted $5 million to the family of Ashli Babbitt. Michael Flynn and Carter Page received $1.25 million each. We can see where this is headed. Among others, the January 6th rioters, all pardoned, will now cash in. Will that include those who’ve subsequently been convicted of other offenses, including possession of child porn? That will probably depend upon whether they can make large purchases of Trump crypto currency.
The damage to our civic culture is incalculable. Nations with high levels of corruption suffer from a suite of pathologies from crime to inequality to low growth to unhappiness. And what can’t be measured but is no less real is the deep sense of shame that living in a corrupt country engenders. The achievement of a well-run, honest government is something to be cherished. As we approach the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, we are witnessing the trashing of a carefully constructed, hard-won system. The United Arab Emirates is now less corrupt than the United States. So is Uruguay. And that was before the latest orgy of plunder.
EACH AND EVERY ACT OF THEFT and corruption is bad in itself and damaging to our national project. It’s something else too—an offense against those who desperately need government help.
If Trump succeeds in looting $1.7 billion from the Treasury, consider what that money could have been spent on. In round numbers, that cash could:
fund vaccines for children in developing countries for thirty-three years.
fund PEPFAR for two and a half years.
restore funding cut by DOGE for medical research on deadly pathogens like hantavirus and Ebola.
restore Medicaid funds that were cut in the One Big Beautiful Bill.
pay the salaries of 7,000 immigration judges for a year.
employ 40,000 home health care aids for one year.
buy replacements for some of the munitions Trump burned through in the feckless Iran war.
purchase 2,600 Stinger missiles or about 6,000 Javelin anti-tank missiles.
fund research to expand the use of mRNA vaccines (cut by RFK Jr.) which have shown promise against RSV, HIV, and flu (in addition to the aforementioned Ebola).
fund studies or demonstration projects on mitigating the effects of climate change.
invest in biotechnology and defenses against future pandemics.
The list of worthy projects that would benefit the public, not just the kleptocrat in the White House, is nearly endless.
Trump’s claim that he would “drain the swamp” is a cosmic joke. His administration is an ongoing shakedown of the American people.
