Why did Türkiye’s democratic regime give way to electoral authoritarianism despite decades of multiparty politics and seemingly favorable conditions for democratization? Following its rise to power in 2002, the Justice and Development Party (AKP) used successive electoral victories to weaken checks and balances and gradually hollow out democratic institutions. Constitutional amendments concentrated power in a hyper-presidential system and enabled a patronage system that expanded executive control over the judiciary and bureaucracy.
Although elections are neither free nor fair in Türkiye, they have nevertheless remained competitive. Opposition parties retain a strong electoral base and secure important victories at the local level. In recent years, however, Türkiye has taken a sharper authoritarian turn under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, with judicial operations targeting the opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) by arresting more than twenty mayors and removing its leader, Özgür Özel, from office.
Join Berk Esen, Andrew O’Donohue, Bilge Yılmaz, Deputy Yunus Emre, Kerem Altiparmak, and Nevşin Mengü as they examine how democratic institutions collapsed after a long period of erosion, how autocratization has transformed Türkiye’s political landscape, and whether the remaining pockets of electoral, legal, media, and civic resistance can support democratic recovery.
Lessons from Global Democratic Resistance is a public panel series that brings together frontline activists, civic leaders, institutional actors, and field‑informed scholars to examine how democratic actors have resisted, responded to, and learned from democratic backsliding across countries. The series aims to identify practical lessons and comparative insights for those defending democracy today and is organized by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in collaboration with the Ash Center for Democratic Governance at the Harvard Kennedy School; the Cornell Center on Global Democracy; Perry World House at the University of Pennsylvania; the Kellogg Institute for International Studies at the University of Notre Dame; the Democratic Futures Project at the University of Virginia; Stanford’s Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law.
No comments:
Post a Comment