Thursday, August 1, 2024

The Atlantic DAily Thursday, August 1, 2024 Tom Nichols Staff writer - Russia and its junior partner, Belarus, have agreed to a prisoner exchange with the United States and Germany


The Atlantic DAily

Thursday, August 1, 2024

Tom Nichols

Staff writer


Americans and their friends in Europe, including among the Russian opposition, have every reason to celebrate today’s releases. But make no mistake: The Kremlin is getting what it wants.


First, here are three new stories from The Atlantic:


The real reason people aren’t having kids

Identity politics loses its power.

Why Trump can’t banish the weirdos

A Dangerous Signal

Evan Gershkovich in a glass cage during his Russian trial

(Natalia Kolesnikova / AFP / Getty)


View in browser


Russia and its junior partner, Belarus, have agreed to a prisoner exchange with the United States and Germany. The deal includes the Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich, the retired U.S. Marine Paul Whelan, and the Russian British journalist and Kremlin opponent Vladimir Kara-Murza among the people who are being released after arrests and convictions on various charges. Some Russian dissidents, including allies of the late opposition leader Alexei Navalny—who himself died in a Russian prison—were also freed and allowed to leave the country.


The Russians, for their part, are going to get their usual basket of criminals, including Vadim Krasikov, a colonel in the Russian intelligence services who was sentenced to life in a German prison after carrying out a Kremlin-ordered hit on a Russian dissident in Berlin. Moscow’s shopping list also reportedly includes a Russian money launderer now in an American prison and two Russian spies caught in Slovenia.


The size of this deal is significant. During the Cold War, the U.S. and the Soviet Union exchanged spies quietly and in small numbers. One of the largest exchanges of that period occurred in 1985, when 25 East German political prisoners were traded for three Soviet spies and one Polish agent. The largest after the Cold War involved 10 deep-cover Russian spies living in America who were arrested by the FBI in 2010 and then traded back for four prisoners from Russia.


The obvious question is why the Russians are making this exchange now, and releasing such a large number of prisoners.


Today’s exchange is not a deal to trade professional intelligence officers as part of some romantic Cold War drama. No one is going to do a Bridge of Spies walk to freedom. (The hostages were flown to Ankara, where both sides agreed to meet and trade their prisoners.) The grubby reality is that the Russians have engaged in successful hostage-taking: They have arrested people on minor or trumped-up charges, and then agreed to free them in return for some very bad people the Kremlin wants to bring back to Russia. Krasikov, for one, will likely go home to “a hero’s welcome,” according to the investigative journalist Christo Grozev (who was reportedly involved in the negotiations). It’s that simple.


The likeliest explanation for why the Russians are doing this now is that Russian President Vladimir Putin and his advisers believe the math finally works in their favor. They grabbed people and placed them, one by one, like slabs of meat on a scale until the West offered enough in return to tip the balance and make the deal worth Moscow’s time. The Russians tried to get Krasikov back after they arrested the WNBA star Brittney Griner, CNN reported, but the United States on its own could not offer a prisoner held in Germany. This time, however, the Russians threw a hapless German citizen into the mix (he was arrested for possession of cannabis gummies) along with the more prominent detainees.


Prisoner swaps always serve at least two Russian purposes, no matter when they take place. One is to show the world that the West, like Russia, trades in flesh. When the media call such deals “prisoner exchanges,” they are being accurate, but the term creates a veneer of equivalence: We have prisoners; they have prisoners; everyone makes deals. The fact that the West is holding Russian murderers and spies and Russia is holding Western journalists and basketball players is lost in the cold details of trading living human beings as if they were heads of cattle or loads of lumber.


But more important—and more dangerous—is the fact that every successful hostage deal is a signal from Putin to the people who do his bidding overseas that he will rescue them if they are caught. In the old American television series Mission: Impossible, U.S. agents were warned that if they were captured or killed, the government “would disavow any knowledge” of their mission. In these prisoner swaps, Putin is affirming the opposite, telling his spies that he never forgets those who serve him and that he will do whatever it takes to get them home.


Putin’s grisly motives are no reason to refuse such deals. Democracies care about the lives of their citizens and should do everything they can to bring innocent men and women back to their families. But the ugly reality is that when the Kremlin springs someone like Krasikov, Putin is telling Russian agents and hired hit men everywhere that they should do their duty with full confidence that Russia will save them from the consequences of their crimes.


Deals like this take weeks, months, even years to negotiate, and no one should try to tie this deal too closely to American politics. The Russians, despite their constant attempts to interfere with U.S. elections, don’t operate on the same timetable as the Republicans or the Democrats. They don’t much care if the deal will be spun as a win for President Joe Biden or whether it undermines Donald Trump’s claims that only he could free Gershkovich. To the Kremlin, all of this is just noise; if anything, it probably decided to pick the fruit of a deal when it was ripe rather than wait for a new administration of either party.


Americans and their friends in Europe, including among the Russian opposition, have every reason to celebrate today’s releases. But make no mistake: The Kremlin is getting what it wants. And any Westerners who set foot in Russia should always understand that they could be the next bargaining chips for some future deal.


Related:

Evan Gershkovich’s Soviet-era how trial

“I was a hostage in Iran. The deals are part of the problem.”

Today’s News

 - The Israeli military claimed today that the leader of Hamas’s military wing was killed in a strike last month, but a Hamas official did not confirm or deny his death.

 - An appeals court in New York denied Donald Trump’s attempt to lift his gag order, which partially restricts the comments he can publicly make about his criminal hush-money trial.

 - Three people who allegedly helped plan the 9/11 attacks, including the alleged main architect, reached a plea agreement, the Department of Defense said yesterday. In exchange for pleading guilty to all counts, the death penalty will be taken off the table.

Dispatches

Time-Travel Thursdays: The Olympics didn’t always inspire global patriotic fervor—just look at the 1896 Games, Stephanie Bai writes.

Explore all of our newsletters here.


Evening Read

The ‘Grandma Gymnast’ Is Here to Stay

(Donald Miralle / Getty)


The ‘Grandma Gymnast’ Is Here to Stay

By Kelly Jones


In 2016, the two-time Olympic gymnast Aly Raisman was known for her incredible floor routine … and penchant for naps. Raisman, the oldest member of the team, took the chance to snooze whenever she could get it. Simone Biles jokingly called her “our sleeping little grandma.” Raisman was 22 years old. So, you know, ancient.


By 2021, at the Tokyo Olympics, Biles was 24 and had earned the “grandma” nickname herself. This year, Biles is 27, she’s competing at her third Olympics, and the average age of an athlete on the U.S. women’s gymnastics team is about 22 and a half. Biles recently apologized to Raisman, saying that she’s learned what it’s like to be a “grandma.”


Read the full article.

More From The Atlantic


Let’s not fool ourselves about yogurt.

Elon Musk says he would recognize a Harris election victory.

How Harris can tackle the Clinton factor

Inoculate yourself against social contagion.

Culture Break

photo of group of croquet players with mallets and balls on green field

(Capital Croquet Club, Washington, D.C., 1988 (From "When Two or More Are Gathered Together," Damiani Books, 2024. © Neal Slavin.))


Check out. Neal Slavin’s When Two or More Are Gathered Together is a photography book with a mandate: All of the pictures had to be group shots.


Debate. The writer Cheryl Mendelson lays out the case against couples writing their own wedding vows.


Play our daily crossword.

Did someone forward you this email? Sign up here.

Stephanie Bai contributed to this newsletter.

When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.


Most Popular on The Atlantic

The Real Reason People Aren’t Having Kids

Let’s Not Fool Ourselves About Yogurt

Identity Politics Loses Its Power

Why Trump Can’t Banish the Weirdos

The Kremlin Gets What It Wants

A new podcast to check your thinking


Every week, host Jerusalem Demsas and guests take a closer look at the facts and research that complicate what we think we know about the world. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.


Start Listening


No comments:

Post a Comment