Thursday, July 24, 2025

The New York Times - Live Updated July 24, 2025, 4:06 p.m. ET32 minutes ago - Trump Administration Live Updates: Justice Dept. to Interview Epstein Associate Ghislaine Maxwell

 The New York Times

  July 24, 2025 

Live

Trump Administration Live Updates: Justice Dept. to Interview Epstein Associate Ghislaine Maxwell

Image
Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at a British royal estate in Scotland in an undated photo used as evidence in her 2021 sex trafficking trial.Credit...Agence France-Presse, via US District Court for The Southern District of New York
  • Ghislaine Maxwell: Justice Department officials are expected to interview Ghislaine Maxwell, the former girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein on Thursday, two people with knowledge of the situation said. The interview of Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. Read more ›

  • U.N. ambassador: Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire broke with fellow Democrats to send Mr. Trump’s nominee for U.N. ambassador to the full Senate. She cited an unusual reason to advance the nomination of Michael Waltz: In exchange for her vote, administration officials promised to release $75 million in frozen aid, money already approved by Congress, to feed people in Haiti and Nigeria. Read more ›

  • Epstein files: A lawyer for hundreds of Mr. Epstein’s victims said the executors of the financier’s estate have a copy of a book in which Mr. Trump was reported to have signed a bawdy poem and drawing for Mr. Epstein’s 50th birthday. The lawyer told MSNBC that he believed the estate would be willing to give the book, compiled by Ms. Maxwell in 2003, to federal authorities. Mr. Trump has denied signing the book. Read more ›

Catie Edmondson

Reporting from the Capitol

Shaheen backs Trump U.N. pick after deal to release frozen foreign aid funds.

Image
Senator Jeanne Shaheen, a New Hampshire Democrat, at the Capitol in June.Credit...Kenny Holston/The New York Times

After Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, cast the tiebreaking vote on Thursday to advance President Trump’s nominee for American ambassador to the United Nations to the floor, she cited an unusual reason.

Part of her decision to vote Michael Waltz’s nomination out of the panel, she said, was that he “represents a moderating force with a distinguished record of military service and an extensive background in national security policymaking.”

At a time when top national security officials in Mr. Trump’s administration have sought to decrease the United States’ footprint around the world, Ms. Shaheen said, Mr. Waltz “did not represent himself to me as someone who wants to retreat from the world — and this is a quality I value in nominees.”

But Ms. Shaheen, who has broken with her party to back other Trump administration nominees in the past, also gave another justification for supporting Mr. Waltz. In exchange for her vote, she said she had won an assurance from officials that the administration would release $75 million it had frozen for the World Food Program and the International Organization on Migration. That includes $50 million for disaster relief in Haiti, including “lifesaving food for 250,000 individuals at risk of extreme/acute malnutrition” as well as public health programs, according to her office. The other $25 million was for food distribution efforts in Nigeria.

The deal, reported earlier by Axios, was remarkable not so much because of how open Ms. Shaheen was about disclosing it, but because she had to bother making it in the first place.

The money, after all, had already been approved by Congress and signed into law. But given the Trump administration’s aggressive moves to unilaterally freeze federal spending in defiance of Congress, particularly foreign aid, a side deal was needed to ensure that the funding would be spent.

“Saving lives through American assistance globally is not only the right thing to do, but it advances our national security and economic interests around the world,” Ms. Shaheen said on Thursday.

Ms. Shaheen cast the tiebreaking vote after Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, voted against advancing Mr. Waltz’s nomination out of committee. He said he had done so because the former congressman voted in 2020 to constrain Mr. Trump’s ability to remove troops from Afghanistan.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Linda Qiu

The Agriculture Department will move most of its Washington-based employees out of the city.

Image
A woman in business attire sitting behind a placard identifying her as “Secretary Brooke Rollins USDA” speaks as she is flanked by two men in business attire.
Brooke L. Rollins, the agriculture secretary, said workers will be relocated.Credit...Kenny Holston/The New York Times

The Agriculture Department will move most of its Washington-based employees out of the nation’s capital, the agency announced Thursday.

Brooke L. Rollins, the agriculture secretary, said in a memo that the agency would keep no more than 2,000 of the 4,600 members of its current Washington work force at offices in the area, instead spreading employees across five regional hubs. The memo also outlined plans to consolidate or eliminate local offices for subagencies focused on research, statistics, nutrition, forestry and conservation.

“President Trump was elected to make real change in Washington, and we are doing just that by moving our key services outside the Beltway and into great American cities across the country,” Ms. Rollins said in a statement.

The vast majority of Agriculture Department employees already work outside the Washington area, spread across the country to assist farmers, conduct research and inspect animal and plant health. The agency’s headquarters, though, are on the National Mall and house offices focused on civil rights, congressional relations and watchdog functions in addition to support staff.

Ms. Rollins noted that more than 15,000 Agriculture Department employees — about 15 percent of the department’s work force of about 100,000 — had taken buyouts. The consolidations and relocations will almost certainly lead to more exits. When the Agriculture Department moved two research agencies from Washington to Kansas City in 2019, each lost more than half of its staff before eventually recovering, according to the Government Accountability Office.

The hubs will be Raleigh, N.C.; Kansas City, Mo.; Indianapolis; Fort Collins, Colo.; and Salt Lake City — all cities that already have regional offices.

According to the memo, the Agriculture Department will also vacate, over the course of several years, the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center — a 115 year-old facility in Maryland that has contributed to improving the shelf life of butter, developing pesticides and creating new varieties of vegetables and fruits.

The American Federation of Government Employees, a union of federal employees, criticized the move.

“This administration is moving at breakneck speed to slash the size of the federal government, often with little thought into the consequences this will have on the American people who rely on the services our members deliver,” Everett Kelley, the union’s president, said in a statement.

David E. Sanger

President Trump’s Mideast envoy, Steve Witkoff, said the administration was recalling its team in Doha, Qatar, where they were attempting to mediate a cease-fire agreement between Hamas and Israel, after a Hamas response to the latest offer showed “a lack of desire to reach a cease-fire in Gaza.”

He added, “We will now consider alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people of Gaza.”

Robert Jimison

The nomination of Michael Waltz, the former national security adviser, to serve as the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations advanced out of committee with one Democrat voting yes and one Republican voting no in the final 12-to-10 count. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky was the sole Republican who sought to impede Waltz’s path to a full Senate vote, while Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire broke with her fellow Democrats to support his nomination.

Shaheen acknowledged in a statement Waltz’s use of an unclassified app, Signal, to discuss sensitive information with other administration officials, but said he “represents a moderating force with a distinguished record of military service and an extensive background in national security policymaking.”

Image
Credit...Kenny Holston/The New York Times

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Michael Gold

Speaker Mike Johnson said in a television interview that he did not consider the Jeffrey Epstein case to be a hoax, a label President Trump has used in the face of backlash over his administration’s handling of materials in the case. “It’s not a hoax,” he told CBS News on Wednesday. “Of course not.”

The Justice Dept. is expected to interview Ghislaine Maxwell in Florida on Thursday.

Image
Ghislaine Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking.Credit...Laura Cavanaugh/Getty Images

Justice Department officials are expected to interview Ghislaine Maxwell, the longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, in Tallahassee, Fla., on Thursday, according to two people with knowledge of the situation.

Todd Blanche, the No. 2 official at the department who brokered the meeting, flew to Florida on Wednesday night, though it was not clear whether he would attend or conduct the interview, one of those people said.

It was also unclear what information Ms. Maxwell, who has made it plain she wants out of prison, could provide beyond what is already in the public record.

The interview is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that federal officials are concealing details about Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. A report in The Wall Street Journal, which described a bawdy birthday poem signed by Mr. Trump as part of a book that Ms. Maxwell put together for Mr. Epstein’s 50th birthday, has further fueled the firestorm.

The involvement of Mr. Blanche, a former criminal lawyer for Mr. Trump, in contacting Ms. Maxwell is an extraordinary effort by an administration official to address a presidential political crisis. It has little, if any, law enforcement implication, and is one of several harried and hurried actions in recent days intended to distract from the furor over the administration’s decision to not release more files in the Epstein case. The case is an obsession of many far-right influencers at the core of Mr. Trump’s base, and officials now in the administration had suggested during the campaign that they would release the files.

On Wednesday, a House Oversight subcommittee voted to subpoena the department for all of the remaining documents that have not been released, a rebuke of the decision this month by Attorney General Pam Bondi and the F.B.I. director, Kash Patel, to reverse course and not release documents and video, citing concerns for victims and witnesses.

All of these efforts by the White House and the Justice Department appear to be stoking even more interest in the case. Increasingly, critics are focusing on Mr. Trump’s friendship with Mr. Epstein, which ended in rancor two decades ago.

Ms. Bondi informed Mr. Trump in the spring that his name appeared in the Epstein files, according to three people with knowledge of the exchange.

The disclosure came as part of a broader briefing on the re-examination by F.B.I. agents and prosecutors of the case against Mr. Epstein, who died in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. It was made by Ms. Bondi during a meeting that also included Mr. Blanche and covered a variety of topics. Ms. Bondi frequently meets with Mr. Trump to brief him on various matters, officials said.

Mr. Blanche and Ms. Bondi, who also served as a lawyer for Mr. Trump, informed the president that his name, as well as those of other high-profile figures, had come up in their re-examination of documents connected to the case that were not public.

It is not clear how significant the references to Mr. Trump are.

In an interview on Wednesday night, a lawyer for hundreds of Mr. Epstein’s victims said the disgraced financier’s estate has a copy of the birthday book.

The lawyer, Brad Edwards, made the comment in an interview with the MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell. Mr. Edwards also said he believed the estate would turn the book over to federal authorities if requested.

“I know the executors are in possession of this book,” Mr. Edwards said.

The birthday book, a compilation of messages from some of Mr. Epstein’s associates and friends at the time, was compiled in 2003 by Ms. Maxwell, The Journal reported last week.

In a statement, the Epstein estate said it would comply with all lawful processes.

Mr. Edwards did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Mr. Trump has denied writing the message and has sued The Journal for defamation.

Megan Mineiro

Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the senior Democrat in the Senate, called on the Trump administration to give a closed door briefing to all senators on the files the Justice Department has on Jeffrey Epstein. “The Senate deserves to hear directly from senior administration officials about Donald Trump’s name appearing in these files and the complete lack of transparency shown to date,” Schumer said.

Image
Credit...Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Matthew Goldstein

Epstein’s estate includes the birthday book said to include Trump’s message, a lawyer says.

Image
Brad Edwards, a lawyer for hundreds of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, spoke to the media after the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in 2022.Credit...Brendan Mcdermid/Reuters

A lawyer for hundreds of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims said the disgraced financier’s estate has a copy of a birthday book in which President Trump is reported to have signed a bawdy poem and drawing in honor of Mr. Epstein’s 50th birthday.

The lawyer, Brad Edwards, made the comment in an interview on Wednesday night with the MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell. Mr. Edwards also said he believed the estate would turn the book over to federal authorities if requested.

“I know the executors are in possession of this book,” Mr. Edwards said.

The birthday book, a compilation of messages from some of Mr. Epstein’s associates and friends at the time, was compiled in 2003 by Ghislaine Maxwell, a former girlfriend and associate, for Mr. Epstein’s 50th birthday, according to a report last week in The Wall Street Journal.

In a statement, the Epstein estate said it would comply with all lawful processes.

Mr. Edwards did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Mr. Trump has denied writing the message and has sued The Journal for defamation. The reported existence of the message has helped to fuel the firestorm in Washington over the Justice Department’s decision to announce that it would not be releasing any more information from its investigation of Mr. Epstein.

Mr. Trump was told by Attorney General Pam Bondi this spring that his name appeared in unreleased files from the investigation. The president has not been accused of any wrongdoing related to the case, and the files are likely to contain references to many people who came in contact with Mr. Epstein.

Mr. Epstein killed himself in a federal jail in August 2019, a month after being arrested on sex trafficking charges.

Ms. Maxwell was convicted in 2021 on charges of helping Mr. Epstein engage in the sex trafficking of teenage girls and is serving a 20-year prison sentence. The Justice Department has said it plans to meet with Ms. Maxwell to see if she has information to provide about others who may have participated in the trafficking of teenage girls and young women.

Ms. Maxwell has maintained her innocence. She is the only other person charged by U.S. prosecutors in connection with Mr. Epstein’s decades-long sex trafficking operation that led to the abuse of more than 200 teenage girls and young women.

The executors of Mr. Epstein’s estate are his longtime former personal lawyer and former personal accountant.

Glenn Thrush and Alan Feuer

Justice Department officials are expected to interview Ghislaine Maxwell, the Jeffrey Epstein associate serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for sex trafficking, in Tallahassee, Fla., on Thursday, according two people with knowledge of the situation. Todd Blanche, the No. 2 official at the department who brokered the meeting, is in Florida, though it was not clear whether he would attend or conduct the interview, one of those people said. The interview is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details about Epstein’s interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump.

Mattathias Schwartz

Mattathias Schwartz covers the federal courts.

An appeals court blocks Trump’s attempt to restrict birthright citizenship.

Image
The front of a gray stone building, looking from the ground up. Inscribed above an archway are the words “James. R. Browning United States Courthouse.”
The ruling appears to be the first time that an appellate court has ruled on birthright citizenship after a Supreme Court decision limiting the scope of injunctions sent lawyers scrambling to recast their claims in light of its new standard.Credit...Jeff Chiu/Associated Press

A federal appeals court ruled on Wednesday that President Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship violated the Constitution, affirming a district court judge’s nationwide injunction and bringing the issue one step closer to a full constitutional review by the Supreme Court.

In a 48-page opinion, two of the three judges on the panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that Mr. Trump’s executive order “contradicts the plain language of the 14th Amendment’s grant of citizenship to ‘all persons born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’”

They rejected the Justice Department’s argument that the words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” meant that the longstanding constitutional guarantee to birthright citizenship could be redefined to exclude babies born to undocumented immigrants, as well as babies born to mothers who are in the country legally but temporarily, such as tourists, university students or temporary workers, if the father is a noncitizen.

The ruling appears to be the first time that an appellate court has ruled on birthright citizenship after a Supreme Court decision limiting the scope of injunctions sent lawyers scrambling to recast their claims in light of its new standard.

The executive order was signed by Mr. Trump on his first day in office. Individuals, states and organizations brought lawsuits, leading to a number of nationwide injunctions that blocked its implementation on constitutional grounds. The Trump administration then appealed one of those cases on an emergency basis to the Supreme Court, but asked it to rule only on the legality of far-reaching injunctions, and not the underlying question of whether the executive order itself passed constitutional muster.

In the original case before Judge John C. Coughenour of the Western District of Washington, four states argued that Mr. Trump’s executive order would force them to put in place new systems to determine who is eligible for state benefits, and reduce the payments they receive from the federal government.

The appeals court said that the fact that states had sued is what allowed it to uphold Judge Coughenour’s universal injunction, despite the Supreme Court ruling that reduced the lower courts’ power. The Supreme Court had left the door slightly open to universal injunctions when they were the only way to address the claim brought by the parties who sued, and the appellate judges found that this was such a case.

The opinion for the 2-to-1 majority was written by Judge Ronald M. Gould, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton. Judge Michael Daly Hawkins, another Clinton appointee, was also in the majority.

In a partial dissent, Judge Patrick J. Bumatay, who was appointed by Mr. Trump, argued that the court should have overturned Judge Coughenour’s injunction blocking the executive order because the states lacked standing to sue, and that the harms they claimed they would suffer under the order were “speculative.” But Judge Bumatay limited his dissent to questions of jurisdiction and standing; he did not address the question of the executive order’s constitutionality.

A group of pregnant women are also plaintiffs in the lawsuit, but the appeals court dismissed their claims, finding that they are already covered by a separate class-action lawsuit in the District of New Hampshire.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Glenn ThrushAlan Feuer

Glenn Thrush and 

Glenn Thrush reported from Washington, and Alan Feuer from New York.

The Justice Dept. announces a task force to assess ‘weaponization’ of intelligence.

Image
Attorney General Pam Bondi’s decision to use a so-called strike force is the latest in a succession of the Justice Department’s efforts to repurpose existing entities to suit the president’s political dictates.Credit...Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times

The Justice Department announced on Wednesday the formation of a task force to look into unsubstantiated allegations by President Trump that President Barack Obama and his aides ordered an investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign’s connections to Russia to destroy him.

The move was posted in an ambiguous, bare-bones statement on the department’s website. It demonstrated Mr. Trump’s determination to deploy the levers of federal law enforcement to pursue a campaign of retribution and self-vindication against those who once sought to hold him accountable.

It also represented yet another Trump attempt to pivot back to the attack, away from the political morass of the Jeffrey Epstein files, by targeting Mr. Obama, whose presidency set off a wave of reactionary anger that helped propel Mr. Trump from a punchline to political dominance.

The creation of a so-called strike force came days after the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, released documents that she said proved top Obama administration officials carried out a “treasonous conspiracy.” That assertion was contradicted by a Senate Intelligence Committee review, which found significant evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election and was led in part by Secretary of State Marco Rubio when he served in the Senate.

It is unclear how the group will operate, or how seriously it intends to pursue Mr. Obama or his former aides.

Another investigative body the Trump administration created in February to go after the president’s enemies — the so-called Weaponization Working Group — has not brought any criminal cases to court. In fact, its leader, Ed Martin, has publicly declared that if he lacks sufficient evidence to charge Mr. Trump’s adversaries, he intends to compensate by merely naming and shaming them.

During a rambling rant at the White House on Tuesday, Mr. Trump rattled off the names of enemies he wanted his Justice Department to target. They included his former F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, and James R. Clapper Jr., the former director of national intelligence, as well as former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Mr. Obama.

“It would be President Obama,” Mr. Trump said. “He started it.”

A spokesman for Mr. Obama reacted with a rare rebuke, calling Mr. Trump’s pledge to use the Justice Department “ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.”

Attorney General Pam Bondi’s decision to use a strike force is the latest in a succession of department efforts to repurpose existing entities to suit the president’s political dictates.

In the past, the department has used the strike force model to coordinate the activities of various government agencies to investigate health care fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud and money laundering offenses, among other violations, according to the Justice Department’s website.

“This department takes alleged weaponization of the intelligence community with the utmost seriousness,” Ms. Bondi wrote in the statement. “We will investigate these troubling disclosures fully and leave no stone unturned to deliver justice.”

Her spokesman did not respond to requests to provide additional details.

As the scandal concerning Mr. Epstein has metastasized in recent days, Mr. Trump and his inner circle have increasingly reached for ways to distract his supporters. Often, that has included making unfounded allegations against his political opponents.

Among those the president has recently accused of wrongdoing are Senator Adam B. Schiff, Democrat of California, whom Mr. Trump has said committed mortgage fraud. There is no indication that Trump officials have opened an investigation into Mr. Schiff.

Chris Cameron

Chris Cameron covered President Trump’s 2024 campaign and his many publicity stunts through the election and the opening months of his second term. He reported from Washington.

Here’s a timeline of Trump’s effort to shift the focus from the Epstein case.

Image
President Trump entering a reception with Republican lawmakers at the White House.
Mr. Trump at a reception at the White House on Tuesday. He has tried to distract from the outcry over his administration’s handling of the Epstein files. Credit...Kenny Holston/The New York Times

Throughout his political career, President Trump has perfected his ability to command media attention through incendiary statements and made-for-headlines announcements. He has also mastered shifting blame to his subordinates and political opponents, turning the public spotlight to his benefit.

But the last two weeks have tested this well-worn strategy as Mr. Trump has tried to pivot attention away from his administration’s decision to close the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender. He has also sought to distance himself from Mr. Epstein after new reports in The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times detailed their past relationship.

Here’s a timeline of the president’s remarks on the scandal, and his various approaches to move on from it:

July 22

In his most recent attempts to redirect the conversation from Mr. Epstein, the president has unleashed a barrage of attacks against former President Barack Obama — an old but reliable target for Mr. Trump. For years, Mr. Trump promoted the lie that Mr. Obama was not legitimately elected because he was not born in the United States, a publicity stunt that significantly raised his profile in the Republican Party ahead of his 2016 run for president.

On Tuesday, during a meeting with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. of the Philippines on trade issues, Mr. Trump accused Mr. Obama of treason, and said that the time had come for his opponents to face criminal charges.

Video
0:00/0:28

Mr. Trump resurfaced his grievances against former President Barack Obama following a meeting with the president of the Philippines in the Oval Office on Tuesday.

The witch hunt that you should be talking about is they caught President Obama absolutely cold. Tulsi Gabbard — what they did to this country in 2016, starting in 2016, but going up all the way, going up to 2020 and the election, they tried to rig the election and they got caught. And there should be very severe consequences for that. Whether it’s right or wrong, it’s time to go after people. Obama has been caught directly.

Mr. Trump resurfaced his grievances against former President Barack Obama following a meeting with the president of the Philippines in the Oval Office on Tuesday.

Later that evening, during a reception with Republican members of Congress, Mr. Trump renewed his attacks against Mr. Obama, falsely claiming he had used deception in the 2016 election. He also plainly stated his intent to use the attacks against the former president as a means to distract reporters and deflect from negative news coverage, suggesting to his fellow Republicans that they respond to “inappropriate” questions by reporters by saying, “Oh by the way, Obama cheated on the election.”

July 20

On Sunday, Mr. Trump spent the day posting on social media about pretty much everything other than Mr. Epstein. He started by celebrating strong poll numbers, then went on to urge the Washington Commanders football team to take back its old name, the Redskins. (In another post, he threatened to derail a deal for the N.F.L. team to build a new stadium in Washington, D.C., if it did not comply.)

8:07 AM

My Poll Numbers within the Republican Party, and MAGA, have gone up, significantly, since the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax was exposed by the Radical Left Democrats and, just plain “troublemakers.”

10:17 AM

The Washington “Whatever’s” should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team.

Later that afternoon, he resorted to attacking longtime political foes such as Senator Adam B. Schiff, Democrat of California, and posted a fake video of Mr. Obama being arrested in the Oval Office. He also posted a three-minute compilation video of stunts. An hour later, he was back to political attacks, this time targeting Samantha Power, the former administrator of U.S.A.I.D.

2:03 PM

Adam Schiff is a THIEF! He should be prosecuted, just like they tried to prosecute me, and everyone else.

6:47 PM

Image
A screenshot from the A.I.-generated video Mr. Trump posted of Mr. Obama on his Truth Social account.
The A.I.-generated video reposted on Mr. Trump’s Truth Social account appears to be manipulated footage of an Oval Office meeting in November 2016 between President Barack Obama and Mr. Trump.Credit...@realDonaldTrump via Truth Social

7:56 PM

HOW DID SAMANTHA POWER MAKE ALL OF THAT MONEY???

July 17

Following The Wall Street Journal’s report that Mr. Trump sent a letter with a lewd drawing to Mr. Epstein for his birthday decades ago, Mr. Trump fired off a number of posts on Truth Social that follow a well-worn playbook for responding to reporting he disagrees with: Deny, attack and threaten to sue.

8:33 PM

The Wall Street Journal, and Rupert Murdoch, personally, were warned directly by President Donald J. Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein was a FAKE and, if they print it, they will be sued.

First, Mr. Trump declared the report fake and threatened to sue, which he did the very next day. He also offered a concession for those in his base who have been demanding the release of all information about the Epstein case:

9:07 PM

Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval. This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!

Many of Mr. Trump’s supporters had been openly flirting with revolt, which could be one reason he also directed Pam Bondi, the attorney general, to seek the public release of grand jury testimony from the prosecution of Mr. Epstein. In his post, Mr. Trump made it clear that he still thought this was unnecessary. (A federal judge in Florida denied the administration’s request on Wednesday.)

In his last post that evening, Mr. Trump primarily reiterated his first post, although he included an interesting denial: “I don’t draw pictures.”

9:57 PM

The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein. These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don’t draw pictures. I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn’t print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I’m going to sue his ass off, and that of his third rate newspaper.

Mr. Trump regularly donated drawings to charities in New York in the early 2000s. Moreover, the drawings, many of which appear to be done with a thick, black marker and prominently feature his signature, are not dissimilar to how The Journal describes the image on the birthday note to Mr. Epstein.

Image
A sketch by Trump, showing he has drawn pictures before.
A drawing by Mr. Trump of the Empire State Building for a charity auction in 1995.Credit...Paul Buck/EPA, via Shutterstock

July 16

After becoming increasingly exasperated by reporters’ questions about Mr. Epstein’s death, as well as attacks on Ms. Bondi, Mr. Trump went from gently coaxing his supporters to move on from the case to actively attacking those who continued to speak out about it. He castigated them as “weaklings” and disavowed them as “PAST supporters” that “have bought into this ‘bullshit,’ hook, line, and sinker.”

9:43 AM

I have had more success in 6 months than perhaps any President in our Country’s history, and all these people want to talk about, with strong prodding by the Fake News and the success starved Dems, is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax. Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don’t even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don’t want their support anymore!

Later that day, he also made an announcement that took Coca-Cola by surprise.

4:19 PM

I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so. I’d like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You’ll see. It’s just better!

A spokeswoman for Coca-Cola would not immediately comment on whether it had agreed to do so, and Mr. Trump’s version of events ultimately proved somewhat misleading. On an earnings call days later, the company said that it would begin offering a cane-sugar version of Coke in the United States this fall “to complement the company’s strong core portfolio.” But it is not replacing high-fructose corn syrup in existing products.

July 12

Image
A photo of a Cabinet meeting at the White House showing Mr. Trump and Ms. Bondi.
Mr. Trump defended Ms. Bondi, and his administration’s decision to close the Epstein investigation, during a cabinet meeting earlier this month.Credit...Doug Mills/The New York Times

5:21 PM

What’s going on with my “boys” and, in some cases, “gals?” They’re all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! We’re on one Team, MAGA, and I don’t like what’s happening.

After days of bruising attacks on Ms. Bondi from influencers within Mr. Trump’s far-right political coalition for failing to produce promised new evidence on Mr. Epstein’s death, Mr. Trump addressed his supporters directly, wondering aloud why they were choosing to undermine his administration by going after one of his own top officials.

The post came after a simmering battle between Ms. Bondi and Dan Bongino, the deputy head of the F.B.I., burst into public view over the Epstein case.

No comments:

Post a Comment