February 3, 2017
Trump Admin. Covers Up Saudi War Crimes in Yemen, Exaggerates Iran's Role
Ben Norton tells Paul Jay that the U.S. and Saudis are overwhelmingly responsible for the atrocities committed in Yemen
PAUL JAY: Welcome to The Real News Network. I'm
Paul Jay.
On Thursday morning, Press Secretary Spicer said
this:
Press Secretary SEAN SPICER: I think General
Flynn was really clear yesterday that Iran has violated the Joint Resolution,
that Iran’s additional hostile actions that it took against our Navy vessel are
ones that we are very clear are not going to sit by and take, I think that
we will have further updates for you on those additional actions, but clearly
we wanted to make sure that Iran knows they are on notice, this is not going
unresponded to.
PAUL JAY: Not only was it not an American ship,
in fact it was a Saudi ship. and it wasn't the Iranians, it was the Houthis. In
fact, if this even took place. But clearly it was not an Iranian attack on an
American ship.
Now joining us to discuss all of this is Ben
Norton. Ben is a reporter for Alternet. His work is also featured in
publications like FAIR, Media Watch and The Intercept. He was previously a
staff writer at Salon.com. Thanks very much for joining us, Ben.
BEN NORTON: Glad to be here. Thanks for having
me.
PAUL JAY: Tell us just a little bit of context,
though, in terms of where things are at in Yemen, and why this is such a
trigger point.
BEN NORTON: Yeah, but we should also be clear
that Sean Spicer, the White House Press Secretary is on record now lying
multiple times. In fact, in his first press conference, he went out and claimed
in an outlandish lie that the inauguration crowd on January 20th, at Trump's
inauguration, was historically large. In fact, it was historically small. So
even though small lies like that, which are demonstrably false, I think
demonstrate that we should be very skeptical of anything they say at all.
So certainly, when they go out and make an
outlandish lie claiming that Iran hit a U.S. vessel, this is absolutely
preposterous and, of course, it contributes this fear, this atmosphere of
fear-mongering about Iran.
And Yemen, this is an issue that I've reported
on a lot, but unfortunately it's not gotten much attention in the U.S. media,
let alone in U.S. politics. It was not mentioned at all in the presidential
election, but since March 2015, the U.S. has staunchly backed a Saudi-led war
on Yemen.
Yemen is the poorest country in the Middle East.
More than 80% of the population for two years now has been in desperate need of
humanitarian aid, according to humanitarian groups. Not only is there a massive
bombing campaign that the U.S. has backed, and Saudi Arabia is leading a
coalition of 10 Arab countries all Sunni majority that are fighting rebels
inside Yemen which are called the Houthis. This is not a religious conflict, but
the Houthis are themselves Shi'a and that kind of shows the political
alliances. There are allegations that the Houthis that the Saudi-led coalition
are fighting are backed by Iran. Rhetorically, they certainly have expressed
support for Iran. Politically, they're certainly aligned. The question is how
much material support they've gotten from Iran, and that is debated.
I mean, most people agree who seriously look at
this, and serious analysts will agree, that Iran's influence is certainly
extant, but it's not large. Iran has sent weapons shipments, likely, to the
Houthis through Oman, but although Oman said that they're going to stop
allowing this to happen. But at the end of the day, the Houthis don't
necessarily need access to foreign weapons.
Yemen is also one of the most highly militarized
-- just in terms of sheer number of weapons -- countries in the world. Most
households have guns. So the Houthis don't have a shortage of weapons, and at
the end of the day the Houthis are themselves Yemeni, but a lot of Saudi
propaganda that has been echoed by the U.S. government for two years now has
claimed that the Houthis are Iranian proxies.
The Washington Post actually published a very
good article based on an expert's analysis saying that, no, the Houthis actually
are not Iranian proxies, and I would invite anyone interested in further
information to read that.
But at the end of the day, the Trump
administration is really using their ties to Iran to push for more aggressive
action. And, of course, another thing to mention really quickly is that the war
in Yemen has been absolutely catastrophic, and destabilizing, too.
Trump's first raid that was carried out, was
carried out in Yemen and it was a complete disaster. At least one U.S. Navy
SEAL died, which got a lot of attention. But what got less attention is that,
according to local medics, more than 10 civilians, including women and
children, were killed in the Navy SEAL raid, one of whom was an eight-year-old
girl, Nawar al-Awlaki, whose father, Anwar al-Awiaki, was killed in a U.S.
drone strike. He was an al Qaeda propagandist, and his 16-year-old son was also
killed in a U.S. drone strike. He... Abdulrahman was a U.S. citizen.
So, I mean, when you look at Iranian policy in
the region I think there's a lot of exaggeration. The U.S. is really
overstating Iran's influence and the war in Yemen--
PAUL JAY: And I think there's another part of
this -- the Saudis have been accused of war crimes in the Yemen war, which are
at least equal to or similar to the accusations against the Assad government
and the Russians, yet there's not a whisper of an accusation of war crimes
against the Saudis from the U.S. government.
BEN NORTON: Absolutely. And Saudi Arabia has
carried out many documented war crimes -- according to human rights groups --
with weapons that were sold by the U.S. and the U.K. Saudi Arabia has... we now
have documentation that they have used cluster munitions in civilian areas in
Yemen.
According to the UN report released last
February, which was authored by a panel of experts on the war in Yemen, they
documented Saudi-led coalition attacks on hospitals, schools, civilian homes,
weddings, you can go down the list, even a humanitarian aid warehouse operated
by Oxfam, even a refugee camp, and of course, the U.S. is staunchly supporting
this. Not only is the U.S. providing weapons, the U.S. and the U.K. have
provided military intelligence to the Saudi-led coalition. And in fact, there
were reports that American and British military officials were physically in
the command room with Saudi bombers when they were choosing their targets. And
then, of course, the U.S. has done more than a thousand refueling sorties for
Saudi planes. So several months ago, in October, when Saudi Arabia bombed a
funeral and injured and killed up to 600 people, most of whom were civilians,
the next day, the U.S. government helped refuel Saudi war planes.
PAUL JAY: But wasn't there a report -- I saw a
report that the Obama administration was actually withholding a certain amount
of arms sales to the Saudis because of the amount of civilian deaths. We're
unlikely to see that under the Trump administration, but is that correct, that
the Obama administration had pulled back some arms sales?
BEN NORTON: Well, there was a report that
claimed that Secretary of State Kerry at the time, had made a deal with Jubeir,
who is the foreign minister of Saudi Arabia, and that they claimed that the
U.S. was going to stop one U.S. arms sale to Saudi Arabia, which was worth
about $1 billion. That may have actually been exaggerated. Reuters released a
story quoting Jubeir, the Saudi foreign minister, in which he downplayed the
significance politically of what happened, and he said that it was mostly a
kind of bureaucratic development, it wasn't really a political decision.
But even if that is true, if we give the Obama
administration the benefit of the doubt, still the Obama administration did
record high arms sales, not just with Saudi Arabia, but with the whole of the
Middle East -- especially with very repressive regimes who the State Department
acknowledges carry out extreme human rights violations.
So, in the case of Saudi Arabia, in his eight
years in office, the Obama administration offered more than $115 billion --
$115 billion with a B -- in arms sales just to Saudi Arabia alone. And, of
course, several billion of those have gone to weapons that have been used
inside Yemen.
As I mentioned, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty
International have photographic and video evidence of cluster munitions
fragments that were made in the U.S. that were in the ruins of civilian areas,
of homes and hospitals and such inside Yemen. So there's no question that at
the end of the day the Obama administration was fuelling actively the war
inside Yemen, which according to the UN, has led to more than 10,000 civilian
deaths, and those are only the violent deaths. In fact, UNICEF this week said
that last year alone 63,000 children -- this is just children -- 63,000
children died from preventable causes, mostly because of lack of access to
medical care and malnutrition.
PAUL JAY: Right.
BEN NORTON: And we now know -- I mean, I've
written on this, other people including Patrick Cockburn -- have written on how
Saudi Arabia-led coalition backed by the U.S. and the U.K. has intentionally
targeted civilian infrastructure, especially food production, inside Yemen,
which has led to mass starvation. The UN has repeatedly, for more than year,
warned that Yemen is on the brink of famine, and more than 14 million people
are going hungry.
So, at the end of the day, the U.S. keeps
blaming Iran for this ... but Iran's role in Yemen is very limited, and
actually at the end of the day, it's a war led by Saudi Arabia with support
from the U.S. and the U.K. against Yemenis. Because the Houthis are Yemenis.
PAUL JAY: Thanks very much for joining us, Ben.
BEN NORTON: Thanks for having me.
PAUL JAY: All right, thanks,
Ben. Thank you for joining us on The Real News Network.
No comments:
Post a Comment