European
Parliament resolution on Russia, the case of Alexei Navalny, the military
build-up on Ukraine’s border and Russian attacks in the Czech Republic
(2021/2642(RSP))
28 April 2021
The European Parliament,
– having regard
to its previous resolutions on Russia and Ukraine,
– having regard
to the UN Charter, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, and the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR),
– having regard
to the package of measures for the implementation of the Minsk Agreements,
adopted and signed in Minsk on 12 February 2015, and endorsed as a whole by UN
Security Council resolution 2202 (2015) of 17 February 2015,
– having regard
to the statement by the G7 Foreign Ministers of 18 March 2021 on Ukraine and to
their joint statement with the High Representative of the Union for Foreign
Affairs and Security Policy of 12 April 2021 on the same topic;
– having regard
to the meeting of the President of France, the President of Ukraine and the
Chancellor of Germany on 16 April 2021 on the issue of the Russian military
build-up,
– having regard
to the declarations by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs
and Security Policy on behalf of the EU of 18 April 2021 on the deteriorating
health of Alexei Navalny,
– having regard
to UN General Assembly resolution 68/262 of 27 March 2014 entitled ‘Territorial
integrity of Ukraine’, UN General Assembly resolutions 71/205 of 19 December
2016, 72/190 of 19 December 2017, 73/263 of 22 December 2018, 74/168 of 18
December 2019 and 75/192 of 16 December 2020 entitled ‘Situation of human
rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol,
Ukraine’, and UN General Assembly resolutions 74/17 of 9 December 2019 and
75/29 of 7 December 2020 entitled ‘Problem of the militarization of the
Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, as well as
parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov’,
– having regard
to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive
measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial
integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine[1],
– having regard
to the Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States,
of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part, and in particular Title II
thereof on political dialogue and convergence in the field of foreign affairs
and security[2],
– having regard
to the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances of 5 December 1994
relating to the accession of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine to the Treaty on
the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,
– having regard
to Ukraine’s proposal of 29 March 2021 to return to a full ceasefire in eastern
Ukraine and the draft of the Joint Action Plan on the realisation of the Minsk
Agreements,
– having regard
to the statement by the spokesperson of the European External Action Service of
19 April 2021 on the expulsion of Czech diplomats and the declaration by the
High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on
behalf of the EU of 21 April 2021 in solidarity with the Czech Republic over criminal
activities on its territory,
– having regard
to Rule 132(2) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure,
A. whereas the
Russian Federation has in recent weeks substantially increased its military
presence on the eastern and northern borders with Ukraine and in occupied
Crimea, amassing a total of over 100 000 troops, as well as tanks,
artillery and armoured vehicles and other heavy equipment; whereas the recent
build-up is the biggest concentration of Russian troops since 2014 and its
scale and striking capabilities indicate offensive intentions;
B. whereas the
Russian Federation has announced the suspension of the right of innocent
passage for warships and commercial vessels of other countries through the part
of the Black Sea in the direction of the Kerch Strait until 31 October 2021,
violating the freedom of navigation, which is guaranteed by the UN Convention
on the Law of the Sea, to which Russia is a party; whereas the areas concerned
are within the territorial sea of Ukraine surrounding the temporarily occupied
territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol;
C. whereas it has
been six years since the adoption of the Minsk Agreements and seven years since
the illegal annexation of the Crimean peninsula by the Russian Federation and
the start of the war in Ukraine;
D. whereas
according to Ukrainian sources, the Russian Federation has approximately
3 000 officers and military instructors serving in the armed forces of the
two so-called People’s Republics;
E. whereas the
destabilisation of eastern Ukraine by the Russian Federation via its proxy
forces in the Donetsk and Luhansk so-called People’s Republics has been ongoing
since 2014; whereas the conflict has claimed the lives of more than 14 000
people and resulted in close to two million people becoming internally
displaced persons (IDPs);
F. whereas
Ukraine has requested that paragraph 16.3 of Chapter III of the Vienna Document
2011 on Confidence- and Security-Building Measures be invoked, requesting ‘an
explanation of unusual military activities’ of the Russian Federation near
Ukraine’s border and in occupied Crimea; whereas the Vienna Document was
adopted by all 57 members of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in
Europe (OSCE) in 2011 to serve as a lasting source of cooperation and military
transparency; whereas the Russian Federation has decided not to participate in
this meeting;
G. whereas OSCE
participating states are to provide each other with information about, inter
alia, deployment plans, to notify each other ahead of time about
significant military activities such as exercises and to consult and cooperate
with each other in the event of unusual military activity or increasing
tensions;
H. whereas the
Russian Ministry of Defence declared on Friday, 23 April 2021 that the amassed
forces would return to their permanent bases by 1 May 2021;
I. whereas the
rights to freedom of thought and speech, association, and peaceful assembly are
enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation; whereas the situation
of human rights and the rule of law continues to deteriorate in Russia, with
authorities continuously infringing on these rights and freedoms; whereas the
Russian Federation is a signatory of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
and the ECHR, and is a member of the Council of Europe;
J. whereas Alexei
Navalny, Russia’s best-known anti-corruption activist and opposition
politician, was detained on 17 January 2021 and sentenced to a 3.5-year jail
term on 2 February for the alleged violation of his probation while he was
recovering in Germany from an assassination attempt by poisoning with a
prohibited military chemical agent perpetrated by agents of the Russian
security services within the Russian Federation; whereas Alexei Navalny was
transferred on 12 March to a penal colony in Pokrov, where he has been
repeatedly subjected to torture and inhumane treatment and subsequently began a
hunger strike more than three weeks ago;
K. whereas these
developments over the past few weeks have confirmed the worst fears about his
personal safety and life among his family, friends and supporters and among the
international community and led to his transfer to a prison hospital near
Moscow, where his life continues to be in danger;
L. whereas on 16
February 2021 the European Court of Human Rights decided to indicate to the
Government of Russia, under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, to release Alexei
Navalny; whereas this measure should apply with immediate effect; whereas the
Court had regard to the nature and extent of risk to Alexei Navalny’s life,
demonstrated prima facie for the purposes of applying the
interim measure, and seen in the light of the overall circumstances of Alexei
Navalny’s current detention;
M. whereas on
Friday, 23 April 2021, Alexei Navalny announced that, following advice provided
by non-prison doctors, he would gradually suspend his hunger strike, which
began on 31 March; whereas the medical advice provided to Alexei Navalny ruled
that continuing the hunger strike would be life-threatening; whereas even if Mr
Navalny receives the necessary care now, there is no guarantee that he would
not be subjected to further inhumane or life-threatening treatment or attempts
on his life;
N. whereas in 2020 Russia ranked 129th out of 180
countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index by Transparency International,
ranking the lowest in Europe; whereas kleptocratic links between
oligarchs, security officers and officials linked to the Kremlin have been
partially exposed by anticorruption activists such as the late Sergei Magnitsky
and the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK) led by Alexei Navalny, implicating the
highest echelons of power, including Vladimir Putin, in investigations into the
unexplained wealth they have amassed over the years; whereas the Moscow
Prosecutor’s Office is seeking to label the FBK and two other organisations
tied to Navalny – the Citizens’ Rights Protection Foundation and Navalny’s
regional headquarters – as ‘extremist’, which would mean that their employees
could face arrest and prison sentences ranging from six to ten years;
O. whereas the
poisoning of Navalny fits in with a pattern of action taken against Putin’s
opponents, affecting Viktor Yushchenko, Sergei Skripal and Vladimir Kara-Murza
and leading to the death of several leading opposition figures, journalists,
activists and foreign leaders, including but not limited to Boris Nemtsov, Anna
Politkovskaya, Sergei Protazanov, Natalya Estemirova and Alexander Litvinenko;
P. whereas the
Russian Federation poses not only an external threat to European security, but
is also waging an internal war on its own people in the form of the systematic
oppression of the opposition and arrests on the streets; whereas on 21 April
2021 alone, the number of arrests of peaceful demonstrators reached more than 1 788,
which adds up to an overall number of more than 15 000 innocent Russian
citizens detained since January 2021;
R. whereas in its
two previous resolutions on Russia, Parliament called for a review of the EU’s
policy towards Russia and its five guiding principles and asked the Council to
immediately start preparations and adopt an EU strategy for future relations
with a democratic Russia, which would include a broad range of incentives and
conditions to strengthen domestic trends within Russia towards freedom and
democracy;
S. whereas the
Czech Republic expelled 18 Russian embassy staff on 17 April 2021, including
members of the Russian intelligence agencies, over the well-founded conclusions
of the Security Information Service of the Czech Republic that Russian
active-duty intelligence officers were involved in an ammunition depot
explosion in 2014 in which two Czech citizens were killed and extensive
material damage was caused; whereas the lives and property of thousands of
people living in the surrounding municipalities were ruthlessly put in danger;
whereas these illegal actions on the territory of the Czech Republic constitute
a critical violation of an EU Member State’s sovereignty by a foreign power;
whereas in response to the Czech Republic’s expulsion of 18 of its embassy
staff, the Russian Federation expelled 20 Czech diplomats, who were ordered to
leave on 19 April 2021; whereas the Czech Republic decided to equal the number
of staff at the Russian embassy in the Czech Republic with the number of staff
at the Czech embassy in Russia on 22 April 2021, following Russia’s refusal to
accept the expelled Czech diplomats back into the country and pursuant to
Article 11 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, giving the Russian
embassy until the end of May to comply;
T. whereas the
same GRU agents involved in the explosion of the ammunition depot in the Czech
Republic were also responsible for the attempted murder of Sergei and Yulia
Skripal in the United Kingdom in 2018 using a military-grade Novichok nerve
agent, which also led to the death of a British citizen; whereas GRU agents
were also charged with the attempted murder of Emilian Gebrev, the owner
of an arms factory, and two other people in Bulgaria in 2015; whereas Russia is non-cooperative in investigating
these crimes committed on European Union territory, denies the involvement of
the GRU in the poisoning of the Skripals and is sheltering key suspects;
1. Supports
Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity within its
internationally recognised borders; reiterates its strong support for the EU’s
policy of non-recognition of the illegal annexation of the Autonomous Republic
of Crimea and the City of Sevastopol; welcomes all of the restrictive measures
taken by the EU as a consequence of the illegal annexation; calls for the
immediate release of all illegally detained and imprisoned Ukrainian citizens
in the Crimean peninsula and in Russia, and deplores the continued human rights
violations perpetrated in Crimea and the occupied territories in eastern
Ukraine, as well as the large-scale conferral of Russian nationality
(passportisation) among citizens in those areas; underlines that Russian officials
whose actions or inaction have enabled or resulted in war crimes in Ukraine
will have to face international criminal justice;
2. Regrets the
current state of EU-Russia relations caused by Russia’s aggression and
continued destabilisation of Ukraine, hostile behaviour towards and outright
attacks on EU Member States and societies manifested, inter alia,
through interference in election processes, the use of disinformation, deep
fakes, malicious cyberattacks, sabotage and chemical weapons, and the significant
deterioration in the human rights situation and respect for the right to
freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly in Russia; strongly
condemns Russia’s hostile behaviour in Europe and calls on its government to
put an end to these activities, which violate international principles and
norms and threaten stability in Europe, which prevents any pursuit of a
positive bilateral agenda with this important neighbour;
3. remains highly
concerned by the large Russian military build-up at the border with Ukraine and
in the illegally occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea, which the Russian
Ministry of Defence declared to have come to an end; condemns these threatening
and destabilising actions led by the Russian Federation and acknowledges with
appreciation the proportionate response of Ukraine;
4. Considers that
the EU must draw conclusions from the deeply concerning Russian military
build-up on the Ukrainian border, which has been suspended as of Friday, 23
April; insists that the return of Russian troops from the border with Ukraine
back to their permanent bases must be done fully and without delay; demands
that Russia immediately end the practice of unjustified military build-ups
targeted at threatening its neighbours, stop all ongoing provocations and
refrain from future ones and de-escalate the situation by withdrawing its
forces to their permanent bases, in line with its international obligations,
such as the OSCE principles and commitments on transparency of military
movements and the Vienna Document; reiterates that the Russian military
build-up also presents a threat to European stability, security and peace,
which is why an EU security dialogue with Ukraine should be ambitious and
contribute to a convergent assessment of the security challenges on the ground;
stresses that friendly countries should step up their military support to
Ukraine and their provision of defensive weapons, which is in line with Article
51 of the UN Charter that allows individual and collective self-defence; calls
on Russia to remove its troops from the so-called People’s Republics of Luhansk
and Donetsk and return control of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the
City of Sevastopol to Ukraine;
5. Urges the Vice-President of the
Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and
Security Policy (VP/HR) to ensure that the Council remains seized of the
military developments despite the announced relocation of Russian troops and
remains prepared to agree on further joint action;
6. Urges Russia
to uphold its obligation under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and to
guarantee the freedom of navigation and transit passage through the
international strait to the ports of the Sea of Azov; calls for the EU to
develop, in close cooperation with Member States and other international
partners, the permanent monitoring of the passage of all vessels coming through
the Kerch Strait;
7. Urges Russia
and Russian-backed separatists to adhere to the ceasefire agreement; calls on
Russia to implement the provisions of the Minsk Agreements, and to engage
constructively in the Normandy Process and the Trilateral Contact Group;
emphasises the need for a political solution to the conflict in eastern Ukraine
and a stronger role for the EU in peaceful conflict resolution;
8. Underscores
that if such a military build-up were in the future to be transformed into an
invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation, the EU must make clear that the
price for such a violation of international law and norms would be severe;
insists, therefore, that in such circumstances imports of oil and gas from
Russia to the EU be immediately stopped, while Russia should be excluded from
the SWIFT payment system, and all assets in the EU of oligarchs close to the
Russian authorities and their families in the EU need to be frozen and their
visas cancelled;
9. Demands that
the EU should reduce its dependence on Russian energy, and urges the EU
institutions and all Member States, therefore, to stop the completion of the
Nord Stream 2 pipeline and to demand a stop to the construction of
controversial nuclear power plants built by Rosatom;
10. Reiterates
its support for the international investigation into the circumstances of the
tragic downing of the Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17, which could possibly
constitute a war crime, and reiterates its call to bring the people responsible
to justice;
11. Calls for the
EU and its Member States to draw on the UK legislative proposal for a Global
Anti-Corruption Sanctions Regulation, and other similar regimes, and to adopt
an EU anti-corruption sanctions regime in order to complement the current EU
Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime; underlines that EU Member States should
no longer be welcoming places for Russian wealth and investments of unclear
origin; calls on the Commission and the Council to increase efforts to curb the
Kremlin’s strategic investments within the EU for the purposes of subversion,
undermining democratic processes and institutions, and spreading corruption;
continues to insist that Member States such as Cyprus, Bulgaria and Malta must
abandon their ‘golden passport’ regimes;
12. Calls for the
immediate and unconditional release of Alexei Navalny, whose sentencing is
politically motivated and runs counter to Russia’s international human rights
obligations, and of all persons detained during protests in support of his
release or his anti-corruption campaign; expects Russia to comply with the
interim measure of the European Court of Human Rights with regard to the nature
and extent of risk to Alexei Navalny’s life; holds Russia accountable for the
health situation of Alexei Navalny and urges Russia to investigate the
assassination attempt on Alexei Navalny, fully cooperating with the
Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons; calls on the Russian
authorities to improve conditions in prisons and detention facilities in order
to meet international standards; calls for the arrests of peaceful protesters
and the systematic attacks on the opposition in relation to the demands to free
Alexei Navalny to be stopped; underscores that all individuals involved in the
prosecution, sentencing and ill-treatment of Alexei Navalny should be subject
to sanctions under the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime;
13. Reminds the
Russian authorities and President Putin personally as the head of the Russian
state that they bear full responsibility for caring for Alexei Navalny’s life
and bodily integrity and must take all necessary measures to protect his
physical and mental health and well-being; continues to urge President Putin
and the Russian authorities to investigate, bring to justice and hold to
account those responsible for his attempted murder;
14. Deplores the
Russian authorities’ intention to declare the Anti-Corruption Foundation headed
by Alexei Navalny an extremist organisation as baseless and discriminatory;
emphasises the fight against corruption and that the desire to participate in a
free and pluralistic public discourse and electoral process is an inalienable
right of any individual and democratic political organisation and has nothing
to do with extremist views;
15. Expresses its
deep solidarity with the democratic forces in Russia committed to an open and
free society, as well as its support for all individuals and organisations who
have become targets of attacks and repression; urges the Russian authorities to
stop all harassment, intimidation and attacks against the opposition, civil
society, the media, human rights and women’s rights defenders, and other
activists in the country, in particular ahead of the parliamentary elections in
autumn 2021; encourages the EU to continuously call on Russia to repeal or
amend all laws that are incompatible with international standards; recalls its
strong support for all human rights defenders in Russia and their work; calls
on the EU Delegation and Member States’ representations in the country to
strengthen their support for civil society and to use all the instruments
available to step up their support for the work of human rights defenders and,
where appropriate, to facilitate the issuance of emergency visas and provide
temporary shelter in the EU Member States;
16. Reiterates
its call for the EU institutions and the Member States to continue closely
monitoring the human rights situation in the Russian Federation and to continue
monitoring court cases involving civil society organisations, journalists,
opposition politicians and activists, including the case of Alexei Navalny;
17. Deplores the
fact that perpetrators from the Russian intelligence services caused the
explosion of the arms depot in Vrbětice in the Czech Republic, which
constituted a violation of Czech sovereignty and represents an unacceptable act
of hostility; strongly condemns activities aimed at destabilising and
threatening EU Member States and calls on Russia to cease any such activities,
to hold those responsible to account, and to compensate the families of the
citizens who died in the 2014 attack; underlines that the European Union stands
by the Czech Republic and calls on the VP/HR and the Council to take
appropriate countermeasures, including extending targeted sanctions in case of
retaliation against the Czech Republic or any other EU Member State; expresses
its deep solidarity with the people and authorities of the Czech Republic
following the Russian attack perpetrated on EU territory and the unfounded and
disproportionate expulsion of 20 Czech diplomats from Russia; expresses its
support for the decision of the Czech authorities to equal the number of the
staff at the Russian embassy in the Czech Republic with the number of staff at
the Czech embassy in Russia, condemns the subsequent threats by the Russian
Federation towards the Czech Republic and appreciates all acts of support and
solidarity provided by different governments of EU Member States and all
diplomatic services already offered; calls on the EU Member States, following
the example of the Skripal case, to proceed with a coordinated expulsion of
Russian diplomats;
18. Condemns
propaganda and disinformation in the Russian press and its malicious spread to
the EU, as well as the work of Russian troll farms, especially those currently
defaming the Czech Republic by claiming that it is a satellite of US interests
and not a sovereign country with independent information services; condemns the
cyberattacks on the Czech strategic state administration institution in
connection with Russian military espionage;
19. Reiterates
that unity among EU Member States is the best policy to deter Russia from
carrying out destabilising and subversive actions in Europe; calls on the
Member States to coordinate their positions and actions vis-à-vis Russia and to
speak with a unified voice; demands that the Member States speak with one voice
within the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on Russia’s
continued disregard of rulings by the European Court of Human Rights; considers
that the EU should seek further cooperation with like-minded partners, in
particular NATO and the US, to use all means available at international level
to effectively counter Russia’s continued interferences, ever-more aggressive
disinformation campaigns and gross violations of international law that
threaten security and stability in Europe;
20. Calls on the
EU Member States to act in a timely manner and with resolve against disruptive
actions by Russian intelligence services on the territory of the EU and to
closely coordinate its proportionate response with transatlantic partners;
recommends that the Member States enhance counterintelligence cooperation and
information-sharing;
21. Calls on the
VP/HR and the Council to devise a new strategic approach to the EU’s relations
with Russia, which must better support civil society, strengthen people-to-people
contacts with the citizens of Russia, draw clear red lines for cooperation with
Russian state actors, use technological standards and the open internet to
support free spaces and restrict oppressive technologies, and demonstrate
solidarity with the EU’s Eastern Partners, including on security issues and
peaceful conflict resolution; underlines that any dialogue with Russia must be
based on respect for international law and human rights;
22. Instructs its
President to forward this resolution to the Vice-President of the
Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and
Security Policy, the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments
of the Member States, the Council of Europe, the Organization for Security and
Co-operation in Europe, the President, Government and Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine
and the President, Government and the State Duma of the Russian Federation.
No comments:
Post a Comment