78 Prominent Artists Demand
National Portrait Gallery End its Relationship with BP
Signatories,
including artists Anton Gormely, Anish Kapoor, and Rachel Whiteread, want the
museum to end its relationship with the oil company.
The controversy around oil sponsorship in the arts has
taken yet another turn in the United Kingdom. It was announced earlier today
that 78 artists have signed onto a letter demanding that the National Portrait
Gallery end its relationship with the oil company BP, which has sponsored the
museum’s Portrait Award for
the last 30 years.
Signatories include
former Turner Prize winners like Anton Gormley, Anish Kapoor, and Rachel
Whiteread. Together, the artists are asking that the museum not renew its
contract with BP when it expires in 2022, start looking for alternative funding
streams, and immediately remove a BP representative from the judging panel for
the award.
“A crucial role of art
is to describe to future generations what it is to be alive now, and to provide
an echo of our humanity to those who seek it in the future,” reads the note,
which is addressed to the British institution’s director Nicholas Cullinan.
“The ethical red lines regarding art sponsorship are always shifting, tracing
the curve of corporate behavior and what’s regarded as the public good.”
This is the second such
letter written by the artist Gary Hume and published by Culture Unstained, a
nonprofit aiming to end fossil fuels sponsorship of the arts.
Hume had juried this
year’s BP Portrait Award before going public with his position against the oil
company last month.
Joined by eight former winners, shortlisted artists and exhibitors for the
prize, that initial letter argued that the Gallery’s refusal of a Sackler Trust
grant in March demonstrated that the museum is indeed prepared to reject
funding when a donor does not share its values.
The National Portrait
Gallery responded at the time with a statement saying, in part, that it
“respects other people’s rights to express their views.” When reached for
comment about the second letter, a museum spokesperson responded to
Hyperallergic over email with the following comment:
With government funding accounting for just 33% of our
total income, it is essential for the Gallery to work with a wide range of
corporate partners to fund our work. Their support enables us to stage
activities and exhibitions that we would not be able to do otherwise and to
remain free and open to all. BP’s long-term support for the Portrait Award directly encourages the
work of talented artists across the world. It also enables free admission to
the exhibition, which attracted over 275,000 visitors in London last year. For
this we are grateful.
We continually aim to expand our list of corporate
supporters and find new funding partners, although attracting new sponsorship
is challenging in the current economic conditions. We have noted the
point the letter raises about a BP representative being on the Portrait Award judging panel, which is
refreshed each year.
Our commitment is to act in good faith and for the public
good. Our challenge is to fulfill our remit, fund our work for the public and
find positive solutions appropriate to the changing times in which we live.
The BP Portrait
Award has courted controversy in recent years. In 2017, winner Henry
Christian-Slane donated £1,000
(~$1,269) of his £7,000 (~$8,883) prize to the anti-BP protests. That same
year, Culture Unstained issued a formal
call to
the Gallery to end its BP sponsorship, saying it violated the museum’s own
ethics policies. Just
days after Hume’s first letter went public in June, anti-oil activists
blocked the National Portrait Gallery’s entrance to protest BP
sponsorship.
But anger about oil money in the arts is not specific to
the Gallery. Late last month, Mark
Rylance — a respected actor, theater director, and playwright — resigned as
an associate artist of the Royal Shakespeare Company while admonishing the
company’s ongoing ties to BP. In
April, Hyperallergic reported about the group Extinction Rebellion’s staged
die-ins at institutions like the Tate Modern and London’s Natural History
Museum. Culture Unstained has
lobbied museums like the Science Museum and British Museum to end oil
sponsorship for years. They have also published research mapping
influence between the oil company, Russia, and human rights abuses abroad. The
group is also part of the Art Not Oil coalition,
which includes other activist groups like Liberate Tate and BP or Not BP?
You can read the full letter below:
Dear Nicholas,
We are writing to you to follow up on the letters sent to
you by myself Gary Hume and other artists before the announcement of this
year’s BP Portrait Award winner. You have said, ‘We are always keen to listen
to the debate and understand the issue and opinion around funding for the
arts.’ Therefore, in a spirit of constructive engagement, we would like to
further the conversation, and encourage you to focus on what we believe to be
the fundamental issue here – BP’s role in furthering the climate crisis, and
our collective responsibility to act.
BP is one of the world’s biggest producers of oil and gas.
Despite its acknowledgement that climate change is a problem, and the
prominence of BP’s green credentials in its advertising, the company is
choosing to invest 97% of its available capital in fossil fuel exploitation and
a mere 3% in renewables. We recognise that a 3% effort towards any goal will
achieve next to nothing, and this kind of glaring contradiction between words
and actions can only remain in place if people don’t challenge it.
Unfortunately, BP’s continued sponsorship of the Portrait
Award is lending credence to the company’s misleading assurance that it’s doing
all it can, and so we, as artists, feel we must speak up.
A crucial role of art is to describe to future generations
what it is to be alive now, and to provide an echo of our humanity to those who
seek it in the future. The ethical red lines regarding art sponsorship are
always shifting, tracing the curve of corporate behaviour and what’s regarded
as the public good. This was clearly demonstrated when the NPG moved away from
its partnership with tobacco company John Player thirty years ago, and the
Sackler family earlier this year.
We believe that, today, the loss of BP as a source of
funding is a cost worth bearing, until the company changes course and enables
future generations to make art in a world that resembles our own.
For the NPG to be seen as a forward-looking institution
that’s on the right side of history we therefore urge you to publicly commit
to:
– not renew the contract with BP when it expires in 2022
– start looking for alternative funding for the Portrait
Award
– as an immediate first step, remove the BP representative
from the judging panel.
Please be assured that you will have our strong support in
taking these steps, and that we believe the number of artists taking this
position will continue to grow.
We are looking forward to your response.
Yours,
Gary Hume
and
Ackroyd & Harvey, Darren Almond, Paul Benney, Tony
Bevan, Aliki Braine, Don Brown, Henry Christian – Slane, Ann Christopher, May
Cornet, Alan Coulson, Fred Cuming, Deborah Curtis, Kenneth Draper, David Eichenberg,
Darvish Fakhr, Laura Ford, Anya Gallaccio, Alison Goldfrapp, Antony Gormley,
Zoe Griffiths, Andrew Hall, Roxana Halls, David Harrison, Wim Heldens, Georgie
Hopton, Rachel Howard, Kenny Hunter, Louisa Hutton, Timothy Hyman, Bill
Jacklin, Tess Jaray, Glenys Johnson, Allen Jones, Alan Kane, Anish Kapoor,
Emily King, Bryan Kneale, Michael Landy, Abigail Lane, Sarah Lucas, Christian
Marclay, Raoul Martinez, Ian McKeever, Alison McKenna, Tess McKenzie, Jeff
McMillan, Lala Meridith – Vula, Misha Milovanovich, David Nash, Paul Noble,
Clare Palmier, Cornelia Parker, Vicken Parsons, Simon Periton, Mike Perry,
Sarah Pickstone, Barbara Rae, Ian Ritchie, Michael Sandle, Johnnie Shand Kydd,
Conrad Shawcross, Julian Simmons, Jane Simpson, Georgina Starr, Sarah Staton,
Emma Stibbon, Gavin Turk, Mark Wallinger, David Ward, Rebecca Warren, Gillian
Wearing, Rachel Whiteread, Alison Wilding, Craig Wood, Bill Woodrow, Craig
Wylie
No comments:
Post a Comment