Monday, August 1, 2022

Air Force Grounds Most F-35s in US Due to Faulty Ejection Seats

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Air Force Grounds Most F-35s in US Due to Faulty Ejection Seats

The extraordinary stand-down order from Air Combat Command does not cover every fighter in the fleet, overseas, or other service branches.

Marcus Weisgerber

BY MARCUS WEISGERBER

GLOBAL BUSINESS EDITOR

JULY 29, 2022

Editor's note: This story was updated at 4:27 p.m. July 29.

The U.S. Air Force has grounded the majority of its F-35s in the continental United States, temporarily taking its most advanced combat fighter jets out of service to inspect faulty ejection seats, the service said Friday.

Military officials recently found issues with explosive cartridges in some aircraft used to propel a pilot’s ejection seat out of the fighter jet. Navy officials on Tuesday said they had found the problem in some of their jets, including several variants of the F/A-18, the E/A-18G Growler, and two training jets.

On Friday, the Air Force disclosed that last week it had ordered inspections of all the F-35’s ejection seats within the next 90 days, according to a spokeswoman for Air Combat Command, the Air Force headquarters that oversees the majority of F-35s based in the United States. 

“Out of an abundance of caution, ACC units will execute a stand-down on July 29 to expedite the inspection process,” Alexi Worley, a service spokeswoman, said in an emailed statement. “Based on data gathered from those inspections, ACC will make a determination to resume operations.” 

The Air Force says it has enough replacement explosive cartridges in stock to replace the faulty ones, a service official said. 

----------------------------------------------------------

Related articles

Inflation, Supply Problems Could Push F-35 Cost Higher Than Expected, Lockheed Says

Lockheed Is Delivering F-35s Late—But the Pentagon Is Also Buying Them Too Quickly, GAO Says

Czech Republic To Buy 24 F-35s Amid Russia's War on Ukraine, Ministry Says

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Worley did not indicate how long the stand-down is expected to continue. A second Air Force spokeswoman said that the grounding was not fleet wide, but did not specify what jets were affected.

No other Air Force command has publicly issued a similar stand-down. Air Force F-35s based outside of the continental United States but are not overseen by Air Combat Command. Within the United States, F-35s are flown by training and testing commands and the National Guard. Air Force F-35s based in Alaska are overseen by Indo-Pacific Command’s Pacific Air Forces, and jets based in Europe are overseen by U.S. Air Forces in Europe. 

The grounding significantly reduces the number of fifth-generation combat jets available at a time when the Pentagon is trying to project military power against Russia in the wake of Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine. Earlier this year, the Pentagon deployed F-35s to Eastern Europe.

The Air Force also flies a  fleet of less than 200 F-22 stealth fighters, some of which it wants to retire next year.

Navy and Marine Corps officials have not yet grounded their F-35s. 

The grounding is the latest in a string of military ejection seat issues in recent years. The F-35 ejection seat is made by the British firm Martin-Baker. 

Spokespeople for the Pentagon’s F-35 program office did not respond to a request  for comment.

A spokeswoman for F-35 manufacturer Lockheed Martin said the company “continues to work closely with the Joint Program Office and customers to ensure safe and effective operations for the F-35 fleet.” The company is also “assisting with seat inspections where appropriate.”

The grounding of ACC’s fighters was first reported by Breaking Defense.


Jennifer Hlad contributed to his report.


Defense One


Arabie saoudite - Visite officielle en France du Prince héritier d'Arabie Saoudite Mohammed bin Salman - Communiqué de presse de la présidence de la République (Paris, 29/07/2022)

 Arabie saoudite - Visite officielle en France du Prince héritier d'Arabie Saoudite Mohammed bin Salman - Communiqué de presse de la présidence de la République (Paris, 29/07/2022)


Le Président de la République, M. Emmanuel Macron, s'est entretenu avec Son Altesse Royale le Prince héritier Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al-Saoud, vice-Président du Conseil des ministres et ministre de la défense, à Paris, le 28 juillet 2022.

Le Président de la République française et le Prince héritier d'Arabie saoudite se sont félicités du renforcement des échanges entre le Royaume d'Arabie saoudite et la France. Ils ont exprimé le souhait d'approfondir la relation entre les deux pays et de poursuivre leur concertation pour relever les défis régionaux et globaux, notamment la lutte contre le réchauffement climatique et ses conséquences.

Le Président de la République a exprimé sa profonde préoccupation face à la guerre d'agression de la Russie en Ukraine, son impact désastreux sur les populations civiles et ses répercussions sur la sécurité alimentaire. Le Président de la République et le Prince héritier d'Arabie saoudite ont souligné la nécessité de trouver une issue au conflit et d'intensifier la coopération pour en atténuer les effets en Europe, au Moyen-Orient et dans le monde.

Le Président de la République a souligné, à cet égard, l'importance de poursuivre la coordination engagée avec l'Arabie saoudite dans la perspective de la diversification des approvisionnements énergétiques des Etats européens et a présenté l'initiative FARM pour la sécurité alimentaire mondiale.

Le Président de la République et le Prince héritier ont rappelé leur attachement partagé en faveur de la sécurité et de la stabilité au Proche et Moyen-Orient et ont marqué leur volonté de poursuivre leurs efforts conjoints en faveur d'un apaisement durable des tensions.

Au sujet des négociations en vue d'un retour à l'accord sur le nucléaire iranien, le Président de la République a marqué la nécessité pour l'Iran de saisir tant qu'il est encore temps l'opportunité qui lui est offerte de revenir au JCPoA. Dans la continuité de la Conférence de Bagdad, qui s'est tenue en août dernier, le Président de la République a rappelé l'attachement de la France à toute dynamique visant à favoriser le dialogue et l'intégration régionale.

Au sujet du Liban, le Président de la République et le Prince héritier sont convenus de renforcer leur coopération, notamment dans le cadre du mécanisme humanitaire conjoint établi à la suite de la visite du Président de la République à Djeddah en décembre 2021. Ils ont prévu de continuer à apporter un soutien au profit des populations vulnérables du Liban. Ils ont également décidé d'intensifier leurs échanges afin de permettre au Liban de surmonter les défis économiques et politiques par la mise en oeuvre rapide des réformes attendues de la part des autorités libanaises.

Le Président de la République a rappelé son attachement au cessez-le-feu dans le Nord de la Syrie et la nécessité, à cet égard, de prévenir toute action unilatérale susceptible de porter atteinte aux efforts de la Coalition internationale contre Daech.

Au sujet de la guerre au Yémen, le Président de la République a salué les efforts de l'Arabie saoudite en faveur d'une solution politique, globale et inclusive sous l'égide des Nations Unies et marqué son souhait que la trêve soit prolongée.

Les deux parties ont également évoqué la situation au Proche-Orient. Le Président de la République a fait part de sa préoccupation. Il a dit sa disponibilité à travailler à une paix juste et durable et à une reprise du dialogue entre les Palestiniens et les Israéliens.

Sur le plan bilatéral, le Prince héritier et le Président sont convenus de développer et d'approfondir le partenariat entre les deux pays.

Alors que nous célébrons les 40 ans de l'établissement de notre coopération bilatérale de défense, le Président de la République et le Prince héritier ont abordé les moyens de poursuivre la coordination en matière de lutte contre le terrorisme et de préservation de la sécurité, notamment maritime.

Rappelant les efforts menés par le Royaume d'Arabie saoudite pour diversifier son économie dans le cadre de la Vision 2030, le Président de la République a marqué la disponibilité des entreprises françaises à accompagner cette transformation, notamment dans les domaines de la transition énergétique. Il a rappelé le savoir-faire reconnu des entreprises françaises en matière de villes durables, de numérique, ou de transports. Le Président de la République a également salué la volonté saoudienne d'accroître ses investissements dans le tissu industriel et productif français.

Abordant la coopération franco-saoudienne autour du site d'Al Ula dans les domaines de la culture, de la recherche et du tourisme, le Président de la République et le Prince héritier ont exprimé le souhait d'étendre cette coopération à de nouveaux champs et institutions culturelles françaises et saoudiennes. Le Président de la République a exprimé le soutien de la France à la candidature de Riyad pour accueillir l'Exposition universelle en 2030.

Dans le cadre du dialogue de confiance entre la France et l'Arabie saoudite, le Président de la République a abordé la question des droits de l'Homme en Arabie./.

(Source : service de presse de la présidence de la République)

Putin, Erdoğan gelmeden Akkuyu nükleer santraline el koydu - Murat Yetkin

 Putin, Erdoğan gelmeden Akkuyu nükleer santraline el koydu

Murat Yetkin

YAYIN TARİHİ 31 TEMMUZ 2022 · GÜNCELLENME TARİHİ 31 TEMMUZ 2022

Putin 5 Ağustos’ta Soçi’de Erdoğan ile görüşmesi öncesi yaptığı hamle ile Ukrayna savaşının ortasında Akkuyu nükleer santralinin tamamen Rusya’ya ait olduğunu ilan etti. Ekonomik kriz nedeniyle Hazine zordayken Erdoğan da Putin’in bu oldubittisini sineye çekmek durumunda kaldı. (Foto: Cumhurbaşkanlığı)

Eğer Akkuyu nükleer santralinin işleticisi Rosatom şirketi 29 Temmuz günü ani bir kararla santralin inşaatının Türk ortağı IC İçtaş şirketiyle sözleşmeyi feshettiğini ilan etmeseydi olacaklardan biri de neydi, biliyor musunuz? Cumhurbaşkanı Tayyip Erdoğan 5 Ağustos’ta Rusya Cumhurbaşkanı Vladimir Putin’le görüşeceği Soçi’den Rusya’nın 10-15 milyar dolarlık Türk Hazine bonosu almaya karar verdiği müjdesiyle dönecekti. Müjde muhtemelen Türkiye-Rusya ticaretinin artık Lira ve Ruble üzerinden yapılacağı dolayısıyla, küresel bankacılığın ABD kontrolündeki SWAP sistemi dışına çıkılacağını da içerecekti.

Putin buna izin vermedi. Erdoğan’ın elindeki kozlardan birini resmen gasp etti ve Soçi görüşmesine 1-0 önde başladı.

Daha önemlisi, Putin 2007’de kuruluşunu kendi yaptığı Rus devlet atom enerjisi şirketi Rosatom’un Akkuyu’nun yüzde 100 sahibi ve işleticisi olduğunu Türk kamuoyuna da ilan etti. Hazine zordayken Erdoğan da Putin’in bu oldubittisini sineye çekmek durumunda kaldı. Projenin bu haliyle aksayacağı, gecikeceği düşünüldü mü? O da pek belli değil.

Erdoğan ve AK Parti’nin Türkiye’nin ilk nükleer santrali diye duyuruyordu ama aslında Türkiye’deki ilk nükleer santral demek daha doğru. Rosatom daha 2010’daki kuruluş anlaşması sonrasında Rusya dışındaki ilk nükleer santralini Türkiye’de, Mersin’in Gülnar ilçesinin Akdeniz sahilinde, Akkuyu’da inşa edeceklerini duyurmuştu.

Moskova’nın Akkuyu operasyonu

Moskova işe bir psikolojik operasyonla başladı. Önce Türk basınına Rusya’dan 20 milyar dolar geleceği haberi verildi. İlk 5 milyar bu hafta gelecekti. Bu para Akkuyu santralinin ödemesi gelen masraflar için kullanılacak, üç hafta içinde gelecek 15 milyar ise 2 yıl Türkiye’de tutulacaktı. Nerede mi? 2007’de Putin tarafından kurulan Rusya’nın atom enerjisi devlet şirketi Rosatom kasalarında.

Bu haber piyasalara kaldıraç etkisi dahi yapamadan, aynı gün IC İçtaş’ın sözleşmesinin feshedildiği haberi geldi. Ertesi gün ise Rosatom, Akkuyu Nükleer Güç Santrali (NGS) inşaatı için TSM Enerji, İnşaat, Sanayi AŞ ile sözleşme imzalandığını duyurdu.

İlk bakışta bir başka Türk şirketi ile anlaşma imzalanmış gibi duruyordu. Oysa gazeteci Toygun Atilla’nın OdaTV’de yayınladığı belgelere göre TSM Enerji, İnşaat şirketinin Merkezi Moskova, üç rus şirketiydi: Montajno-Stroitelnoye Upravneliye ve Sosnovoborelelektromontaj ve inşaatın Rus yüklenicisi Titan-2.

İçtaş uluslararası mahkemelere başvuracağını söylüyor. Hükümet şimdilik bu oldubittiyi sineye çekmiş görünse de onlar çekecek gibi görünmüyor. Ama Putin’in Erdoğan ile görüşme gündemindeki muhtemel konulardan önemli birisini daha Erdoğan gelmeden, hem de Erdoğan’ın müdahalesi olamadan gündemden çıkardığı söylenebilir.

İnşaatta ortaklık da bitti

Akkuyu dünyada “yap-sahip ol-işlet” sistemiyle kurulan ilk enerji santrali oluyor. “Yap-işlet-devret” sisteminin “devret” kısmı da yok yani; bir süre sonra Türk devletine devredilmeyecek, hep Rosatom’un kalacak, anlaşmaya göre. Rosatom, malum, Rusya’nın atom enerjisi devlet şirketi. Kuruluş tarihi 2007, kurucusu da Putin.

Başlarda santral inşaatını, yine Rus devlet şirketlerinden Atomstroyexport ile Cengiz-Kalyon-Kolin ortaklığı konsorsiyumu üstlenmişti. (Evet, malum beşliden üçü.) 2018 yılında Rosatom’un yüzde 25 ortaklığıyla kurulan JSC Titan-2 şirketi 2019’da Akkuyu inşaatının Rus ortaklığını devraldı. Aynı yıl, yükümlülüklerini yerine getirmediği gerekçesiyle Cengiz-Kalyon-Kolin sözleşmesi feshedildi ve Türk inşaat ortağı yüzde 50 payla IC İçtaş oldu.

İşin dikkat çekici bir dikkat çekici bir yanı da daha 21 Temmuz’daki 4’üncü ünite temel atma töreninde inşaatın takvime uygun ilerlediğinin takdirle anılmasından 8 gün sonra sözleşmenin feshedilmesi. Bu da kararın ekonomik olmaktan çok siyasi olduğunu gösteriyor. Zaten gazeteci Çiğdem Toker’e göre, hükümet de projenin ekonomik olmadığını bildiği için tanıtımı için ayrı bütçe dahi ayrıldığını yazmıştı. Son gelişmeler bu durumu kanıtlıyor.

İçtaş uluslararası mahkemeler başvuracağını söylüyor. Tabii ABD ambargosu yüzünden Rus şirketlerin Batıdan ithal etmek zorunda olduğu parçalarda IC’nin sorumluluğunun artık kalmayacağını da kaydedelim. Ama sonuçta şu anda Akkuyu projesinde hiçbir Türk katısı kalmamış durumda.

Fiyat çok yüksek

Rusya ile yap-işlet, senin olsun anlaşmasını o zaman başbakan olarak Putin ile imzalayan ve AK Parti oylarıyla Meclis’te onaylanmasını sağlayan Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan’ın, önceki başbakanlardan Mesut Yılmaz’ı Rusya ile Mavi Akım doğal gaz hattı projesine “al-ya da öde” şartıyla imza attığı için eleştirdiğini hatırlatalım.

Türkiye santralin her biri 1200 megavat gücündeki dört türbinin ilk ikisinden (ki ilkinin 2023’te devreye girmesi gerekiyor) üretilecek elektriğin yüzde 70’ini, diğer ikisinden üretilecek elektriğin de yüzde 30’unu TEDAŞ üzerinden 15 yıl boyunca almayı garanti ediyor.

Hem de ne fiyattan, biliyor musunuz? Dünyada pek örneği olmayan bir fiyattan: kilovat saatine 12,35 sent/ABD dolarından, yani 12,35 sentten Bugün itibarıyla ABD dolarını 17,92 liradan hesap edersek, 221 kuruş.

Halka ve devlete ağır yük

Peki devletin halkın haklı tepkisine yol açan elektrik fiyatlarını belirleyen dağıtım şirketlerine elektriği ortala olarak kaç liradan sattığını biliyor musunuz? Enerji Piyasası Düzenleme Kurumuna (EPDK) ortalaması 125 kuruş. Üstelik Akkuyu elektriğinin fiyatı Türk lirası ABD doları karşısında değer kaybettikçe otomatik olarak artacak.

Yükselen maliyetler karşısında elektrik fiyatının ekonomik olarak satılabilir olmaktan çıkması nedeniyle Japonya Sinop nükleer santrali inşaatından çekilmişti. Ama Akkuyu NGS sayesinde “sıcak denizlere” inen Rusya’nın bu ballı anlaşmadan çekilme niyeti yok, tam tersine, Ukrayna savaşının ortasında, kritik bir görüşme öncesinde adeta gövde gösterisi yapıyor, 2010’da atılan imzalar üzerinden.

Şimdi soru şu: Acaba Erdoğan Karadeniz’de Rusya’ya nazır Sinop’ta ikinci santralin yapımını da Rusya’ya verir mi?

Bunun acısı hem elektrik fiyatları üzerinden hem de Hazine’ye getireceği yük üzerinden halktan çıkacaktır.

Erdoğan Soçi’de ne görüşecek?

Gazeteci Ragıp Soylu, Rus belgelerine dayanarak konunun Rosatom’un 6,1 milyar dolarlık Hazine bonosu almasına bağlanabileceğini yazdı. Hükümet henüz resmî açıklama yapmadı. Belki hala bu haberler hiç ortaya çıkmamış gibi Soçi dönüşü müjdelemeyi düşünüyordur Beştepe.

Kremlin daha Akkuyu hamlesini yapmadan önce görüşmede Türkiye’nin kolaylaştırıcılığı ve kefil olmasıyla BM gözetiminde imzalanan Ukrayna-Rusya tahıl anlaşmasının konuşulacağını duyurdu. Oysa Erdoğan, daha çok Suriye’de PKK ve yan örgütlerine karşı yapmak harekâta Rusya’nın engel çıkarmamasını, daha önceki operasyonlarda olduğu üzere, Suriye rejim güçlerinin buna müdahale etmemesini sağlamasını konuşmak istiyor.

İnsanın aklına Süleyman Demirel’in Erdal İnönü’yle DYP-SHP koalisyonunu kurarken söyledikleri geliyor: “Türkiye bir daha asla siyasi şartlı para arar hale gelmemelidir.”

Milli Savunma Bakanı Hulusi Akar’ın ABD’nin Suriye’de MİT takibiyle öldürülen SDG yöneticisi PKK militanına taziye yayınlaması ardından ve Soçi görüşmesi öncesinde “F-16 vermezlerse alternatifimiz var” demesi, sanki Erdoğan’ın Putin’le yeni silah anlaşmasına gideceği imasını da taşıyor. Ukrayna savaşı sürerken mümkün olur mu? Çok zor.

Çok zor ama manzara böyle işte.

China-US Relations Posted on August 1, 2022 by Ali Tuygan (Rtd. ambassador)

 

China-US Relations

August 1, 2022

Presidents Biden and President Xi Jinping had their next-to-last call on March 18, 2022, less than a month after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Since then,

  • On July 7, the heads of the UK and US security services made an unprecedented joint appearance to warn of the threat from China. The BBC reported that FBI director Christopher Wray said China was the “biggest long-term threat to our economic and national security” and had interfered in politics, including recent elections. The MI5 head Ken McCallum said his service had more than doubled its work against Chinese activity in the last three years and would be doubling it again.
  • On June 29, NATO leaders met in Madrid. The summit declaration named Russia as the most significant and direct threat to Allies’ security and to peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic area and also said that allies face systemic competition from those, including China, who challenge allied interests, security, and values and seek to undermine the rules-based international order.
  • For the first time, NATO’s 2022 Strategic Concept said that China’s stated ambitions and coercive policies challenge NATO members’ interests, security, and values.
  • Last Wednesday the US Senate passed a $280 billion bill aimed at building up America’s manufacturing and technological edge to counter China.
  • But attention focused on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s “visit to Taiwan” and President Biden’s remarks on the visit prompted the Washington Post to publish an editorial titled “Pelosi should go to Taiwan — when the time is right”.[i]

Last Thursday the two presidents spoke again. Following the call, a White House official said the conversation was substantive, candid and basically took three parts.

First was a detailed discussion of areas where the two countries can work together, with a particular focus on climate change and health security, as well as counternarcotics.  Second, the two leaders exchanged views on Russia’s war in Ukraine and the global impacts it is having. And third, they had an in-depth discussion on Taiwan. President Biden reaffirmed the United States’ commitment to the One China Policy. Regarding the Pelosi visit, the official said it is her decision.

Chinese readout of the call said the two Presidents had a candid communication and exchange on China-US relations and issues of interest.[ii]

According to the readout, President Xi pointed out that faced with a world of change and disorder, the international community and the people around the world expect China and the US to take the lead in upholding world peace and security and in promoting global development and prosperity. This is the responsibility of China and the US as two major countries

President Xi objected to defining China-US relations in terms of strategic competition and presenting China as the primary rival and the most serious long-term challenge and underscored the need to maintain communication at all levels and make good use of existing channels to promote bilateral cooperation, de-escalate regional hotspots, to reduce the risk of stagflation and recession, and uphold the international system centering on the UN and the international order underpinned by international law.[iii]

President Xi, the readout said, elaborated on China’s principled position on the Taiwan question adding, “Those who play with fire will perish by it. It is hoped that the US will be clear-eyed about this. The US should honor the one-China principle and implement the three joint communiqués both in word and in deed.”

If the areas, where China and the US can focus on are climate change health security, and counternarcotics, and if all Secretary Blinken and Foreign Minister Lavrov can speak about is prisoner exchange, this is a huge problem. There is no doubt that climate change as shown by devastating forest fires, droughts and floods is the number one challenge facing the human race. But forming a global coalition that is able to take decisive action to fight climate change requires more than cooperation on health security and counternarcotics. It requires ending wars, promoting global security, arms control, and a shift from military spending to climate-friendly projects.

By contrast, the war in Ukraine continues with no end in sight. The Middle East is years away from stability. JCPOA’s future remains uncertain. And tensions are likely to rise in the Indo-Pacific. Total global military expenditure increased by 0.7 percent in real terms in 2021, to reach $2113 billion. The five largest spenders in 2021 were the United States, China, India, the United Kingdom, and Russia, together accounting for 62 percent of expenditure, according to new data on global military spending published by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).[iv]

During the past two decades, the US fought its longest war in Afghanistan, invaded Iraq, encouraged Georgia to challenge Russia, and took part in Arab spring interventions. All proved failures. The Taliban are back. Iraq is in turmoil. Parts of Georgia are gone. In the meantime, China focused on its economic development. It built economic bridgeheads across the world becoming the world’s top trading nation. It avoided getting involved in international disputes, and Arab spring adventures. US officials have continuously referred to its aggressive policies, but Peking has not allowed regional questions to turn into crises. It has not resorted to force.

Washington is now engaged in intense diplomacy to counterbalance Beijing’s growing outreach in Africa and the Middle East and to broaden the opposition to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine without much success. On the contrary, many in those regions are increasingly referring to the West’s colonial past.

Washington is also trying to reinforce its bilateral security arrangements with Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. It is seeking to form a united front against China through AUKUS, the Quad, and the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework. However, with multiple challenges on the domestic front, Washington’s dual containment of Russia and China is not a realistic policy. It would only bring Moscow and Beijing closer together and lead to discord in the Western camp.

The Chinese readout of the Biden-Xi call modestly refers to China and the US as “two major countries”. In reality, with Russia now bogged down in Ukraine, they are the world’s two leading powers. Thus, embracing multilateralism, bringing some semblance of stability to the world, and addressing global challenges is indeed their responsibility.

————————————————————————————————-

[i] https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/27/pelosi-visit-taiwan-china-influence/

[ii] https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/202207/t20220729_10729593.html

[iii] https://diplomaticopinion.com/2021/05/10/the-rules-based-international-order/

[iv] https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2022/world-military-expenditure-passes-2-trillion-first-time

Why Rishi Sunak’s Tory leadership campaign is failing

 Why Rishi Sunak’s Tory leadership campaign is failing

It remains possible that the former chancellor could yet turn the tables on Liz Truss – but even his supporters think it unlikely

By

Gordon Rayner,

 ASSOCIATE EDITOR

29 July 2022 • 7:40pm

Rishi Sunak

One veteran of multiple Tory leadership campaigns said Rishi Sunak ‘is fighting the wrong election’ CREDIT: Peter Nicholls/Getty Images Europe

For a man whose campaign was built on the inevitability of victory, Rishi Sunak could hardly be further from his goal. Three weeks into the Conservative leadership race, polling suggests that Liz Truss, his opponent, is almost out of sight.

Mr Sunak’s team unquestionably overestimated his popularity with Conservative Party members and underestimated that of Ms Truss.

It remains possible that the former chancellor could yet turn the tables – but even his supporters think that unlikely, barring an unexpected trip-up by the Foreign Secretary.

Seasoned political campaigners say the reasons why the Sunak campaign has been such a flop – and there are many – have been obvious from the start.

Some believe his campaign was always going to be dead on arrival thanks to his recent track record in government and his “backstabbing” of Boris Johnson, but others think he could have been ahead by now if he had “got his messaging right”.

All agree that his about-turn on VAT cuts this week was a sign of panic and might have snuffed out the sputtering candle of his leadership bid.

“Quite simply, he is fighting the wrong election,” said one veteran of multiple Tory leadership campaigns. “You only ever deal with the electorate that is in front of you, not the next one.

“They are running the campaign as if they are fighting a general election, but they have to win this one first and it’s a very different electorate.”

Even the fact that Mr Sunak chose not to wear a tie for TV debates has been seen as a sign that he was trying to appeal to the general public rather than Tory members, who prefer their leaders more buttoned-up.

Accusations that Team Sunak does not understand the Tory membership crop up over and over again among MPs and strategists. Some blame Liam Booth-Smith, his former chief of staff at the Treasury and the keystone of his campaign team, for failing to make sure his boss is fully connected with members’ views. 

Others blame Mel Stride MP, his campaign manager. Many blame Mr Sunak himself.

“He has a very safe seat in Yorkshire where he can have barbecues for friendly Tory types in the garden of his mansion,” said one MP. “He hasn’t spent enough time going up and down the country finding out what members really think, whereas Liz Truss does seem to grasp what the membership wants.” Such as tax cuts.

Another catastrophic miscalculation by the Sunak campaign has been the backlash against him for his pivotal role in bringing down Mr Johnson.

“Rishi and his team seemed to think that he would be hailed a hero for resigning and getting rid of Boris,” said another Tory MP. “They thought Liz Truss would be tainted by standing by Boris. But the membership hates back-stabbers – as Michael Gove found out – and values loyalty, and Truss made the right decision to stay on because a lot of the members still prefer Boris to either of them.”

Whether Mr Sunak could have done any better is open to debate. Those who have flocked to Ms Truss’s side believe his campaign was always doomed because of his high-tax policies as chancellor, but there are impartial observers who believe he could have been in pole position now.

“He had the best-prepared campaign and his team have been tooling up for months,” said one political strategist. “They had a big head start – but they had the wrong message, and if you have the wrong message it doesn’t matter how slick your campaign might be.

“Their message was: you might not love my economics but it’s successful so stick with me and we will be OK. And for people who didn’t agree with that, the second part of the strategy was: I’m a winner, I’m the one who can win the next election.

“Instead, they should have been selling the fact that he has promised tax cuts before the next election, that he is the one who spent £37 billion on handouts to help with energy bills, and that there would be more to come.”

Those looking from the outside in are also baffled by Mr Sunak’s decision earlier this week to promise to scrap VAT on energy bills for a year if he became PM – a measure he had opposed when it was suggested by Mr Johnson earlier this year.

“If you ask anyone who has run a successful political campaign, they will tell you that you never deviate from the core message,” said the strategist. “Dominic Cummings knows that, Alistair Campbell knows that. You set out your stall and you stick to it.

“Attacking Liz on the numbers could have cut through. They should have gone out every day and said her numbers don’t add up, they should have sharpened that message, hammered away at it relentlessly and made people doubt her credibility.

“But they have lost their nerve in a big way by saying they might cut VAT. That is a campaign in trouble. It’s out of their hands now, because they can’t criticise Liz on fairytale economics any more.”

At the start of the leadership campaign, members of Mr Sunak’s team told The Telegraph that they wanted to create an inevitability about his eventual victory. That, too, has backfired.

“There is an arrogance and an assumption that he would glide through,” said one Whitehall source. “Members pick up on that. The fact that the campaign website was registered in December, all that putting his signature on stuff, it annoyed a lot of people.”

Placeholder image for youtube video: xaUkwy1mm5o

Mr Sunak’s social media campaign is the remit of Cass Horowitz, the 31-year-old son of the author Anthony, who is credited with polishing up Mr Sunak’s image when he was chancellor and producing his slick campaign launch video.

“The slickness is a problem,” said a source who backed one of the unsuccessful candidates in the earlier rounds of the contest. “If you’re spending all your time worrying about camera angles and faffing around on Instagram, you’re not focusing on the important stuff.”

One of the key planks of the “inevitability of success” strategy was to get more than half of Tory MPs to publicly back Mr Sunak, proving to members that he could unite the party.

With three former chief whips on board – Gavin Williamson, Mark Harper and Mark Spencer – Mr Sunak was expected to come out of the gate with around 130 MPs backing him in the first round of voting, but only managed to get to 137 when the field had been whittled down to three, meaning fewer than four in 10 MPs were on his side.

Some MPs believe the figure would have been even lower, and that he might not have made it to the final two, had it not been for Mr Williamson “working his magic and convincing a lot of MPs the Rishi train was unstoppable”, meaning they needed to back him if they wanted jobs in a future Sunak government.

With many MPs undeclared, increasing numbers, such as Ben Wallace, are now backing Ms Truss and not Mr Sunak because she has the momentum and they are convinced she will win.

A lack of humility has also characterised the Sunak campaign: “A lot of his advisers still see him as the golden boy who did furlough and was the most popular member of the government for a while,” said a Whitehall source.

“Some of the people around him can’t see anything other than ‘he’s great’, which is why they came up with that ‘Ready for Rishi’ slogan. What does that even mean? It suggests that people need to get ready for him as PM because he’s already won, and people don’t like that sense of entitlement.”

Mr Sunak lost the support of some Tory members by interrupting Ms Truss more than 20 times in 12 minutes during the BBC head-to-head hustings event – a trait that should have been ironed out by his team in their exhaustive rehearsal sessions.

Placeholder image for youtube video: nFHrA56jHXo

One Tory source who knows him well said: “He is a calm and smiling character on the outside, but there is an angry and arrogant man waiting to break out – and we saw flashes of that in the TV debate.

“Liz has been around longer, she has been the butt of jokes, she has been the punchline on Have I Got News For You, and she has developed a thicker skin.”

Mr Sunak, of course, was once hailed as the new face of the Right by none other than Ms Truss. He has now veered so much to the centre that he has been compared to a socialist. Tory members could be forgiven for wondering which is the real Mr Sunak.

“I think his Right-wing credentials were always exaggerated,” said one minister who has worked with him. “He is ultimately very much an establishment figure. He supported Brexit but then did absolutely nothing about it. It was a play for the Right rather than something he wanted to go up and down the country championing.

“It’s very much the old Cameroons who are behind him, and that makes sense because he represents their view of the world.”

Others say Mr Sunak was ensnared by the “Treasury orthodoxy” in the three years he spent as chief secretary to the Treasury and then chancellor.

“Very few chancellors are able to stand up to Treasury orthodoxy,” said a senior Conservative source. “Most chancellors go along with it, and that is the trap that Rishi Sunak fell into.

“That’s why he reversed the corporation tax cut. It damaged his reputation with the Right, who thought he might as well be the permanent secretary of the Treasury as chancellor. I’m not sure he was ever going to recover from that.”

It is striking that most of his campaign team worked with him in the Treasury, and his campaign manager Mr Stride is a former Treasury minister, giving them a somewhat narrow world view.

“Rishi is a banker and a former chancellor surrounded by Treasury people, whereas Liz is a pure politician,” said the PR strategist.

“Rishi will look at data and decide that people are still able to pay their bills so he doesn’t need to take more action just yet, whereas Liz understands that it’s not just about numbers, it’s about how people feel. Boris understands that, Blair understood it, but Rishi doesn’t seem to.

“People who can still pay their bills and have enough money left to go on holiday might not be struggling – but they are worried about what’s coming, and Liz understands that. It affects confidence, and if you can restore confidence that goes a long way. A spreadsheet doesn’t really tell you that.”

For now, Mr Sunak needs to hope he can keep the gap small enough for him to take advantage if Ms Truss falters.

“This is probably the first time in his life he has had to confront the possibility of failure,” said one former colleague. “It will take him a long time to get over it if he loses.”

First ship carrying grain leaves Odessa in deal to ease global food crisis

 

First ship carrying grain 

leaves Odessa in deal to 

ease global food crisis

Ship awaits in the grain elevators section the port in the city of Odessa, Ukraine, 29th of July 2022. (Wojciech Grzedzinski/ For The Washington Post)
Comment

ODESSA, Ukraine — The first ship carrying grain departed a Ukrainian port under a United Nations-brokered deal to ease a global food crisis sparked by the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

The departure of the cargo vessel loaded with corn from Odessa on Monday came despite fears the deal, inked in late July, would fall apart after a recent Russian attack on the port.

The wail of a Ukrainian tug boat’s horn marked the departure of the Razoni, a Sierra Leonian-flagged bulk carrier that began the journey at 9:30 a.m. local, departing from the port. The ship was destined for Lebanon, according to Turkey’s Defense Ministry.

A Russian missile strike less than 24 hour after the deal was reached threatened the initiative. The passage of merchant ships from Ukraine along designated maritime corridors is being supervised by a coordination center in Istanbul, staffed by delegations from Ukraine, Russia, Turkey and the United Nations.

In a statement Monday, the center said that it had agreed to “specific coordinates and restrictions” along the maritime corridor, and “requested all its participants to inform their respective military” and other authorities to ensure the Razoni’s safe passage.

The ship, it added, was carrying more than 26,000 metric tonnes of corn and was expected to arrive in Turkish territorial waters on Tuesday.

Following inspection in Turkey, it would continue on to Lebanon, the statement said.

Readout from the Chinese side: President Xi Jinping Speaks with US President Joe Biden on the Phone 2022-07-29 00:14

 

President Xi Jinping Speaks with US President Joe Biden on the Phone

2022-07-29 00:14

On the evening of 28 July, President Xi Jinping spoke with US President Joe Biden on the phone at the request of the latter. The two Presidents had a candid communication and exchange on China-US relations and issues of interest.

President Xi pointed out that in the world today, the trends of turbulence and transformation are evolving, and deficits in development and security are looming large. Faced with a world of change and disorder, the international community and the people around the world expect China and the US to take the lead in upholding world peace and security and in promoting global development and prosperity. This is the responsibility of China and the US as two major countries.

President Xi underscored that to approach and define China-US relations in terms of strategic competition and view China as the primary rival and the most serious long-term challenge would be misperceiving China-US relations and misreading China’s development, and would mislead the people of the two countries and the international community. The two sides need to maintain communication at all levels and make good use of existing channels to promote bilateral cooperation. Recognizing the many challenges facing the global economy, President Xi underscored the need for China and the US to maintain communication on such important issues as coordinating macroeconomic policies, keeping global industrial and supply chains stable, and protecting global energy and food security. Attempts at decoupling or severing supply chains in defiance of underlying laws would not help boost the US economy. They would only make the world economy more vulnerable. The two sides need to work for deescalation of regional hotspots, help rid the world of COVID-19 as early as possible, reduce the risk of stagflation and recession, and uphold the international system centering on the UN and the international order underpinned by international law.

President Xi elaborated on China’s principled position on the Taiwan question. President Xi highlighted that the historical ins and outs of the Taiwan question are crystal clear, and so are the fact and status quo that both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to one and the same China. The three Sino-US joint communiqués embody the political commitments made by the two sides, and the one-China principle is the political foundation for China-US relations. China firmly opposes separatist moves toward “Taiwan independence” and interference by external forces, and never allows any room for “Taiwan independence” forces in whatever form. The position of the Chinese government and people on the Taiwan question is consistent, and resolutely safeguarding China’s national sovereignty and territorial integrity is the firm will of the more than 1.4 billion Chinese people. The public opinion cannot be defied. Those who play with fire will perish by it. It is hoped that the US will be clear-eyed about this. The US should honor the one-China principle and implement the three joint communiqués both in word and in deed.

President Biden said that the world is at a critical moment. US-China cooperation benefits not only the two peoples but also people of all countries. The US hopes to keep an open line of communication with China to enhance mutual understanding and avoid misperception and miscalculation, and will work with China where the interests of the two countries align and, at the same time, properly manage differences. He reiterated that the one-China policy of the US has not changed and will not change, and that the US does not support “Taiwan independence”.

The two Presidents exchanged views on issues including the Ukraine crisis. President Xi reiterated China’s principled position.

Both Presidents viewed their call as candid and in-depth. They agreed to stay in touch and instructed the two teams to keep up communication and cooperation.