US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has completed a trip to Beijing and a meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Long delayed by the appearance of a suspected Chinese spy balloon in US skies, Blinken’s visit was intended to stabilize the superpower relationship, and Blinken cited “progress” on that front.
Leading up to Blinken’s trip, observers saw an imbalance—as The Diplomat’s Shannon Tiezzi wrote, Washington appeared to want this trip to happen much more than Beijing did—and high stakes.
In a roundup of expert analyses at ChinaFile, published before Blinken’s meetings, Evan Madeiros suggested that while both countries “are being told by the rest of the world to manage their competition better,” they have seemingly irreconcilable visions for getting there.
“Washington’s strategy has two parts,” Madeiros wrote: “on the one hand, expanding communication, risk management, and, when possible, cooperation and, on the other hand, expanding competitive economic, diplomatic, and military policies. Washington officials say, ‘intense competition requires intense diplomacy.’ China summarily rejects this. For Xi, stability can only come from a reduction in the U.S.’s constant strategic pressure on it and, of course, greater U.S. sensitivity to China’s top priorities like Taiwan.”
In the same roundup, Bonnie Glaser was more optimistic, writing: “Distrust … is at its highest point in more than 70 years. Nevertheless, both countries have an interest in stabilizing ties … The best possible outcome of this visit is that both sides, directed by top leaders to produce mutually beneficial results, agree to hold more exchanges and dialogue in the coming months. … The stakes are high. With the United States nearing election season, the window to stabilize U.S.-China relations is limited and may soon close. … Progress will not be easy and will require enormous political courage from both sides.”
No comments:
Post a Comment