Tuesday, August 4, 2026

The Atlantic Daily - Monday, August 3, 2026 - by David A. Graham - Less tahn two years Trump and Republicans have lost their black, hispanic, and young supporters

 

David A. Graham

David A. Graham

Staff writer

Donald Trump’s big gains with Black, Hispanic, and young voters in 2024 suggested a major shift in the voting landscape. Less than two years later, the president and his fellow Republicans have lost those new supporters.  

First, here are four new stories from The Atlantic:

The New Era That Wasn’t

(Brendan Smialowski / AFP / Getty)

View in browser

Fundamental realignments in the way Americans vote are rare, but predictions that they have occurred are not. Nearly as soon as Donald Trump was declared the winner of the presidential race in November 2024, people started saying the election represented a new era. “Trump just realigned the entire political map. Democrats have ‘no easy path’ to fix it,” announced NBC News.

The election had been very close. Trump won slightly more electoral votes than Joe Biden had in 2020 (312 to 306), but he also won fewer total popular votes and a smaller percentage of the vote. This was still significant because it was the first time in three tries that Trump had captured a plurality of the electorate, but the case for realignment hinged less on raw numbers than on demographic breakdowns. The Republican Party had strengthened its grip on the white working class and had done historically well with young voters—young men in particular—and Hispanic voters.

Writing in The Atlantic in May 2025, the pollster Patrick Ruffini argued that a new era of politics had dawned, in which Trump had broken Democrats’ solid grip on minority voters. “The realignment of the working class, which helped Trump win in 2016, would not stop with white voters. In 2020 and 2024, the realignment came for nonwhite voters,” he wrote. “In an era of nationalized politics and growing polarization, the social basis for Democratic majorities is looking more and more tenuous.”

The Democratic Party’s problems remain very real, but for the moment, Trump and the GOP have more serious ones. The most glaring one is Trump’s deep personal unpopularity. In the current polarized and dyspeptic political environment, all presidents seem to be unpopular, but Trump is in a different league. A CNN poll released last week measured Trump at 34 percent support, matching the low he reached in that poll following the January 6 insurrection. Still, that was better than his showing in the AP-NORC survey, which found his approval at 33 percent, just one point above a 2017 low. Quinnipiac University found Trump at 32 percent, the lowest ever in that poll.

These broad strokes are ugly enough, but digging into polling results shows particular deterioration with the particular groups that were supposed to be at the center of the Trump 2024 realignment.

Consider young voters. Kamala Harris won a slim majority of them in 2024, a huge drop from the 25 percent margin that Biden enjoyed four years earlier. The Yale Youth Poll found in May that 68 percent of voters ages 18 to 22 and 72 percent of voters ages 23 to 29 disapproved of Trump. Echelon Insights also found that younger voters disapprove of Trump more than the general population—the number has fallen 37 percent since the start of this administration. Polling from the Harvard Institute of Politics found that young voters are especially skeptical of expanded presidential power and claims of “national emergency”—two staples of Trump’s approach to governance.

One reason Trump’s numbers have sunk so much among young people is his poor performance among young men. A popular explanation was that a feminized, woke Democratic Party had driven them away and into the arms of Trump and a growing manosphere of influencers. To the extent that that was true, it was ephemeral. These voters are still wary of the Democrats, but they’ve soured on Trump as well. The Yale Youth Poll found that men under 30 were one of the two groups that had turned the most against Trump since last fall.

Trump is also bleeding support among Black and Hispanic voters, and especially men, as Bloomberg Government reports. In 2024, Trump won almost half of Hispanic voters, but polls show Republicans drawing 27 to 35 percent support in the midterms, which would be their worst performance with the group since the Democratic-wave year of 2018. Equis, a pollster focused on the demographic, finds Latino approval of Trump is lower than that of non-Latino voters. A May poll found that a quarter of Hispanics who voted for Trump in 2024 wouldn’t do so again.

The decay has even reached Trump’s core supporters. A New York Times review of polling data found in June that white working-class voters’ views of the president’s handling of the economy were tanking. During the first two years of his first term, these voters rated him higher than the overall population; now they rate him much worse. In February 2016, Trump boasted about his backing among the least-educated voters, saying, “I love the poorly educated.” They don’t love him back: Echelon finds his approval down to 41 percent among those with a high-school education or less. Polling from the Institute for the Study of Modern Authoritarianism finds a shrinking Trump base and less personal connection to Trump, which is a particular problem for a personalist leader and movement. Republican strategists are now worried that even consistent GOP voters might not turn out in November, according to The Washington Post.

As the poll analyst G. Elliott Morris has written, several convincing explanations existed for Trump’s 2024 victory that didn’t involve realignment, including the lingering effects of the pandemic, global anti-incumbent sentiment, and the peculiar dynamics of Biden’s ill-advised decision to run and his late exit from the race. But the foremost was inflation. Americans were angry at the Democratic Party because of persistently higher prices. Now Trump is losing support for the same reason. Not only has Trump not ended inflation, as he promised—in June, it ran at 3.5 percent—but his decisions, especially the Iran war, have driven prices higher. Voters were willing to give Trump a chance because of their disgust with Biden. Now they’re seeing the results, and they don’t like them.

This was perhaps foreseeable. Although some observers believed a sea change had occurred, the Brookings Institution scholar (and Atlantic contributor) Jonathan Rauch concluded on November 9, 2024, that the result did not represent “a pro-MAGA realignment or a sweeping repudiation of Democrats. Rather, this was an ordinary election.” He added, prophetically, “While the Republicans undoubtedly scored a clear victory, they may be tempted to claim a stronger mandate than the voters intended to deliver—and they may respond with policies that are more extreme and disruptive than the public wants or expects.” Now the realignment looks nearly as moribund as GOP chances in the midterms.

Related:

Today’s News

  1. Republican Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis said that they will support Todd Blanche’s nomination for attorney general after the Justice Department rescinded a planned $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization fund” and clarified the scope of an IRS settlement involving President Trump. Their support clears the way for the Senate Judiciary Committee to advance Blanche’s nomination tomorrow.
  2. Michigan health officials reported two deaths linked to the state’s cyclosporiasis outbreak, saying both people had significant underlying health conditions that may have been worsened by the illness and dehydration. More than 11,000 cyclosporiasis cases have been reported in the state since early May, according to Michigan’s health department.
  3. Nearly 65,000 people have been evacuated in Spokane County, Washington, as three major wildfires have burned more than 8,000 acres. No deaths or injuries have been confirmed, though officials warned that additional structures remain at risk as crews continue to assess the damage.

Dispatches

Explore all of our newsletters here.


More From The Atlantic

Evening Read

(Illustration by Matteo Giuseppe Pani / The Atlantic)

In parks, in backyards, in woods that are lovely, dark, and deep, a many-legged menace now stalks the land. I speak of ticks, and I come bearing absolutely no good news. In recent decades, ticks have made the leap from nuisance to genuine public-health threat: Their numbers are rising. Their ranges are expanding. And the diseases they carry are multiplying. Lyme cases have more than doubled since 2000, in which time scientists have also discovered eight new tick-borne diseases—plus an unusual and potentially dangerous tick-induced meat allergy called alpha-gal syndrome.

“The ticks are winning,” a CDC scientist wrote in a recent paper.

Culture Break

(Illustration by Matteo Giuseppe Pani / The Atlantic. Source: Getty.)

Debate. A plan to renovate Dulles, one of America’s most hated airports, will surely be popular—but the airport is actually fine the way it is, Adrienne LaFrance argues.

Take a look. Which screen is the “good screen” now? Instagram TV brings the endless scroll to your television, Kaitlyn Tiffany writes.

Play our daily crossword.


Drew Goins

Drew Goins

Senior editor

An announcement: This iteration of Atlantic Trivia will soon be ending—and a new, souped-up game will assume its place. But for now, just keep quizzing!

The Millennium Stage, Hall of States, and Eisenhower Theater are all spaces within what U.S. landmark?
From Janay Kingsberry’s article on the one sign of life at an American institution

PS

On Friday, I wrote that a battle over Todd Blanche’s nomination to be attorney general showed that Trump cared more about his $1.8 billion slush fund than Blanche, and that “dissident Republicans really can push Trump around if they want to.” Late Friday, Trump seemed to confirm that by filing an appeal of a judge’s ruling against the fund. But last night, the office of Senator John Cornyn, one of two Republicans who was blocking Blanche, announced a deal to move forward. A statement said that the Justice Department “will be issuing a formal order permanently terminating the anti-weaponization fund.” The details remain a bit vague, but the track record of administration promises to senators does not instill a great deal of confidence.

— David


Did someone forward you this email? Sign up here.

Sign up for Inside the Trump Presidency, a newsletter in which Atlantic writers help you understand America in the second Trump term.

Rafaela Jinich contributed to this newsletter.

When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.

Play the latest Atlantic game

Lemony Snicket's Suspicious Incident at Dubious Park — a new game from The Atlantic

There’s been a murder at Dubious Park, and only you can catch the culprit. Interrogate eccentric parkgoers, investigate the grounds, and use your skills of deduction to stop the killer—before they strike again. Play Lemony Snicket’s Suspicious Incident at Dubious Park, new at The Atlantic Games.

Play Now



No comments:

Post a Comment