Israel and Iran seem to agree on one thing: They aren’t buying what U.S. President Donald Trump is selling when it comes to a peace deal.
After Hamas recently agreed to a U.S.-backed framework for disarmament, Trump declared “a monumental step toward lasting PEACE and SECURITY” and noted that Israel was “very happy” with the agreement. Yet Israel has expressed strong opposition to the disarmament roadmap, citing “serious security concerns.” Israeli withdrawal also seems far off in Lebanon, where the conflict has seen seven rounds of U.S.-brokered talks.
It’s not that the Israeli public sees Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s forever wars as stunning successes, according to David E. Rosenberg. But “Israelis believe the country has no choice but to pursue its enemies aggressively or risk another massacre,” he writes. Even with an election in October, the opposition can only nip at the edges of Netanyahu’s policies.
When it comes to negotiating an end to the Iran war, meanwhile, Tehran sees its control of the Strait of Hormuz as powerful leverage. In a statement released on Saturday, it issued a list of demands for the United States before the waterway would open.
The only way through, FP’s Howard French argues, is for Washington to confront what has been hiding in plain sight for decades: recognizing the legitimacy of Iran’s Islamist government and offering the country strong security guarantees, no matter how distasteful that seems to the foreign-policy establishment. —Amelia Lester, deputy editor
No comments:
Post a Comment