CARNEGIE Vakfı Uzmanları, ABD'nin Iran'daki nükleer tesisleri bombalamasının sonuçlarını irdeliyor. 10 Temmuz 2025

 

CARNEGIE 

Dear Colleague, 

Israel's and the United States' attacks on Iran represented a momentous event in the history of efforts to combat the spread of nuclear weapons —and not for the better. Carnegie's nuclear policy team has been at the forefront of warning about the likely ineffectiveness of military action, analyzing its consequences, and identifying constructive policy options. 

• James Acton made the case against U.S. strikes on Iran in The New York Times and, afterwards, argued in Politico that Iran could still build the bomb in a year or less.
• 
  
• Nicole Grajewski analyzed the war’s political effects in Diwan and their military effects in Emissary. Before the U.S. strikes, Nicole and Ankit Panda argued in The Boston Globe that the United States should condition support for Israel on Israeli restraint.
• 
  
• Corey Hinderstein appeared on MSNBC, the Strategic Simplicity Podcast, and Morning Joe to discuss the impacts of the strikes on Iran’s nuclear program.
• 
  
• In Emissary, Jamie Kwong set out a strategy for preventing Iran’s withdraw from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
• 
  
• Jane Darby Menton argued in Foreign Policy that transparency will be key to preventing further instability.
• 
  
• In The Financial Times, Ankit assessed the war’s dangerous consequences for the nonproliferation regime.
• 
  
• James and Nicole were both interviewed by Isaac Chotiner for the New Yorker, while Nicole was also interviewed by New York Magazine.

I hope you enjoy these articles. As always, you can find all our work here.

Sincerely,
Toby Dalton
Senior Fellow and Co-director, Nuclear Policy Program
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace