Leading US tech firms may not like having a new, Chinese competitor nipping at their heels—but The Economist writes that the DeepSeek news is good, on balance.
“[T]here are far more winners than losers from the DeepSeek drama,” the magazine wrote this week. “Some of them are even within tech. Apple will be cheering that its decision not to throw billions at building AI capabilities has paid off. … Smaller labs, including France’s Mistral and the Emirati TII, will be racing to see if they can adopt the same improvements, and try to catch up with their bigger rivals. Moreover, efficiency gains are likely to result in greater use of AI.”
At Bloomberg Opinion, columnist Catherine Thorbecke plays a tiny violin for the US tech community: “Silicon Valley has no shortage of innovators, or inflated egos. US tech leaders paint themselves as visionaries … [b]ut there’s an insidious, insular mindset baked into American society that leads its tech elite to believe they’re the only ones who can lead the charge.” DeepSeek has dealt a blow to such hubris, Thorbecke writes.
“There are other factors that play a role in America’s huge blind spots when it comes to China,” which made DeepSeek’s breakthrough such a surprise in the US, Thorbecke continues. Those are: “[a] language barrier, separate social media ecosystems, and a shrinking number of foreign reporters based in the country limit US visibility into some of the most exciting aspects of an innovative society. DeepSeek’s earlier models easily fell through the cracks in this environment. And unlike those in the US, Chinese entrepreneurs are incentivized to stay out of the spotlight in the wake of a government crackdown on tech power.”
No comments:
Post a Comment