In numerous occasions Greece’s major parties have expressed their intention to send as their representatives to the European Parliament the “best and the brightest”.
Still, as the process of choosing the respected candidates moves ahead, it seems that we will again end up with a number of people whose main “advantage” is that they are well known to the public but lack the necessary competence to adequately promote Greece’s national interests in Brussels.
To be fair, there are exceptions. Among the candidates announced so far there are professionals from different backgrounds, all widely respected for their accomplishments, who would serve the country well.
On the other hand, athletes, artists and other familiar faces to the public, might be a healthy part of society, but they are not necessarily the best possible legislators.
Given the decision not to move to an election law that would allow the leaders to choose the order with which the candidates would be placed on the ballot – in essence deciding which ones would be elected and thus end up in Brussels – we are again faced with the possibility that many of the 21 delegates Greece will have as Members of the European Parliament, will not be up to the task.
We still have four months to go, and one hopes that the final list of candidates and the way the parties will promote them, will allow for the best possible mix.
This criticism is not aimed at a specific party or parties, but rather is valid across the political spectrum.
The argument is very simple and goes beyond the ideological differences that are an integral part of the democratic process: Greece as a country will be better off the higher the quality of all its representatives in the European Parliament is.
No comments:
Post a Comment